IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [edu-discuss] Is the EDU team ossified?

Spencer Dawkins <spencer@wonderhamster.org> Tue, 02 April 2013 18:21 UTC

Return-Path: <spencer@wonderhamster.org>
X-Original-To: edu-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: edu-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC49621F8BC5 for <edu-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 11:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 33QFqJnRbdPx for <edu-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 11:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.195]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1437E21F8BBC for <edu-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 11:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.79] (99-108-174-213.lightspeed.rcsntx.sbcglobal.net [99.108.174.213]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus4) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0Lon23-1Up1yC3mGJ-00ghCP; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:20:21 -0400
Message-ID: <515B2159.7030800@wonderhamster.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 13:20:09 -0500
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencer@wonderhamster.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
References: <20130320104353.27601.24590.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CADnDZ893B70g3i0rTTiy6JMH26SVkwyZwGS9vhY8DqEn0CU8NA@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ88Gs1VvvpEsEoPyMLyHV1JeTWVXtsfs4NgYrncCdvjZ7Q@mail.gmail.com> <514FB516.6050702@joelhalpern.com> <CADnDZ8_9ZHtNG7rVhMSCr8R9L6+MicM+LPQdaRP=_x==wAZWKA@mail.gmail.com> <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F124081A49EEF29D@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk> <CADnDZ8-Zt7fiyhr4GShB1pi+RxNopc6mHwRZz=aVYc6fwJPJLw@mail.gmail.com> <514FF8B4.70706@pi.nu> <515067B2.90507@stpeter.im> <E5702460F58067FF393C56F6@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <515100B2.2060305@stpeter.im> <6.2.5.6.2.20130326164344.0d0dc4a8@resistor.net> <5152A7D0.6050000@gmail.com> <A35754F2-48EF-4E5E-AD6C-236AD3312521@sobco.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130327204237.0c5f7a58@resistor.net> <5154486D.1010709@wonderhamster.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20130328095537.069da4e0@resistor.net> <5154A876.3050604@wonderhamster.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20130401205741.0ac2d828@resistor.net> <CAHBDyN7XQSCTeqBX_5JXGU4g+viQVbPpANqiM8oD48UPV0eVuA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHBDyN7XQSCTeqBX_5JXGU4g+viQVbPpANqiM8oD48UPV0eVuA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:47NwduHcuYyNK/fNyiOMUoRJtipKZQRLMk/O7lZh8xQ eHVvVD3rKEv3scOd6NJCzw2e+MAsFc9Yb6u/5PkBYE6oxfDOXb nphuYXSYqsvS3fCr0Q4141sZa59T3jLFKvZ8QBgoNFs/tb+os2 YCgfq774E8yX2Zlum6R3vCU/XP0sT7d62pAP+otfyWq1v0tXaj EJGfQWGrIk+YPULF0Ye6L8XOJEUnEpaNHDB8qOltd9bChwwMYu 6bCF+OgwWlQRJypHun7mczXQinhc7jrQeYjvMLNrlBpsfytmit ruoLqSP7PS1EL9KG3dCU+LDKVkpFbQid3Z+YweoJIMJ8a7Axg+ asvNBrH33JMHmhCm1LeYjZFEX9JFvScwZ9w63XVpF
Cc: Peter Koch <pk@denic.de>, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, edu-discuss@ietf.org, "Moriarty, Kathleen" <kathleen.moriarty@emc.com>, Scott O Bradner <sob@sobco.com>
Subject: Re: [edu-discuss] Is the EDU team ossified?
X-BeenThere: edu-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Education Discussion <edu-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/edu-discuss>, <mailto:edu-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/edu-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:edu-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:edu-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-discuss>, <mailto:edu-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 18:21:03 -0000

On 4/2/2013 8:18 AM, Mary Barnes wrote:
> SM,
>
> Why don't you write a draft that discusses the issues you are seeing,
> along with ideas on how to solve them?

This sounds like a good idea.

 > It seems you think that the
> Tao and newcomer's training are not at all adequate.

At least on the newcomer's training, I thought I was hearing that the 
newcomer's training wasn't inadequate, just that it might be more 
comprehensive than someone attending their first IETF meeting might need 
(or be able to absorb).

I know I hope that most IETF participants pick up what's in the 
newcomer's training, and sooner is probably better than later - only 
that they might not need to pick it up before the 9 AM Monday session 
starts :-)

Spencer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email