Re: [edu-team] IETF 99 Tutorial Survey Results

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 22 August 2017 20:50 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: edu-team@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: edu-team@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56EA2132A54 for <edu-team@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 13:50:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UBV516-TKg7O for <edu-team@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 13:50:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22c.google.com (mail-oi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 964E9132A57 for <edu-team@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 13:50:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id g131so198048994oic.3 for <edu-team@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 13:50:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=GbNX8WHzLD0urLa5IxINdWhXaN8tPjSqK2zOzYS5mE4=; b=bTL/vQD8MQYEbFliSw/gxztGTanTwE1Ei2kQMhY4U/IifaV4kJxcjlX0B4UZtHGgdX /IojRL+aflLJcC+ksOU+bWYdAGbaj5LLQaZkvvTG5I8ABLtqqunkNzz9VbPep2lE8yug xjPXg0DjRgLK4VFidyypHeSpPrkuLijPM2X0H2SwwVICXbz1NPkwBFFYKRmkMBABnEoJ SzSoJOOrdvTsYfN1h8zolExQ1Ay/pF2r2FFL5WwJuEH+w0ElQVTD6hqsu+QWuUUvg7Za RYqSErE7/Mn8R8jB+l/z0EM+EA8WLHWEwl0eO2WR0X5vCqwJOyeiP4Rxz4gk0cGhf+rG BuAg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=GbNX8WHzLD0urLa5IxINdWhXaN8tPjSqK2zOzYS5mE4=; b=BsCKYaSRdAgRoBoYBID3E48VFPNQQ+pMeg2lwadrDXvH4kSikf9B8O6zJXZUStL9N0 rOrsVRpgRH4uI///DpGajT+q567SWZj+ZeGxicsdosMMAzjzl5DwYSzFscCgmR6IB10v b8IbO5zekfoGwUHkLDvWvnbM6jOopjJD7tU5RWqDcfgLY+AlVWepT9x13IGbBOOTG+5p PvZ5HxtxiGNXJYL+3sAgwLgxxRC+XlI2V50s03QiPFkw+g9Pty1zJiunVjzQC/Kus80U vmb5N+NI4z8QrzF1YVwUAGLdFkfT0x4S0MZV2/Y4C6tiLQurpng9P68Z4u67Kqq8KY5N 5l8w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5hlfuRO9dfK6mmTkzBuCWLkNbQkyMEd4+rLgmvkQK01QnbvdVRa Rth6JJQ01Ajm6Q==
X-Received: by 10.202.190.65 with SMTP id o62mr641981oif.42.1503435040000; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 13:50:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:8802:5600:1e::1000? ([2600:8802:5600:1e::1000]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m72sm10925158oig.4.2017.08.22.13.50.38 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Aug 2017 13:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.0 \(3445.1.3\))
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <D77AF3C7-E90B-413D-8539-546F6EA0AF9F@amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 13:50:37 -0700
Cc: EDU Team <edu-team@ietf.org>, Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>, Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com>, Allison Mankin <allison.mankin@gmail.com>, János Farkas <janos.farkas@ericsson.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F9F58E4D-316F-453E-84A7-FEDD28655226@gmail.com>
References: <D77AF3C7-E90B-413D-8539-546F6EA0AF9F@amsl.com>
To: Alexa Morris <amorris@amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.1.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/edu-team/67kNGLUnK3O87FY--YASgQ9gMhk>
Subject: Re: [edu-team] IETF 99 Tutorial Survey Results
X-BeenThere: edu-team@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Education Team <edu-team.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/edu-team>, <mailto:edu-team-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/edu-team/>
List-Post: <mailto:edu-team@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:edu-team-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-team>, <mailto:edu-team-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 20:50:42 -0000


> On Aug 22, 2017, at 1:27 PM, Alexa Morris <amorris@amsl.com> wrote:
> 
> - Two respondents call out the desire for an organizational chart. I think the EDU team should discuss options for how to best provide this info, as clearly people are looking for it. 

The big question in such an org chart has always been "how to draw the IAB" and "how to draw ISOC". In various org chart drawings I have seen over the years I have seen IAB and ISOC drawn as the top bubble, and quite a bit of ensuing debate terminating in "they aren't the top bubble" but nothing definitive as to where they belong. 

Excluding IAB and ISOC (and the IAOC?), it's not too hard. I think the simplest way to display ISOC and IAB without causing a riot will be to show them as adjunct organizations; "these are also involved, but it's not a hierarchy".

                          +----+
                          |IESG|
                          +----+
              Some number of areas (currently 7)
   -+--------------+--------------+-----------------
    AD             AD             AD
    |              |              |
    +- directorate +- directorate +- directorate
    |              |              |
    +- WG          +- WG          +- WG         ...
    |              |              |
    +- WG          +- WG          +- WG
    |              |              |
    +- WG          +- WG          +- WG
    |              |              |
    +- ...         +- ...         +- ...
    |              |              |