Re: [Efficientnd-dt] 6man IETF 92 Call for agenda items

Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Tue, 03 March 2015 14:09 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: efficientnd-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: efficientnd-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C9A11A7D83 for <efficientnd-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 06:09:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x91XMZ6mEv56 for <efficientnd-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 06:09:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from banjo.employees.org (banjo.employees.org [IPv6:2001:1868:205::19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0802D1A86E8 for <efficientnd-dt@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 06:09:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from banjo.employees.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by banjo.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0522B627A; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 06:09:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=employees.org; h=subject :mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id :references:to; s=selector1; bh=aF34zGZ/6A8ed/JOQCHbBzgqneo=; b= j3sUY8pfBHtRyjbZ8tUVrADb47PutcLzOS3OuVKLmazugh+FrgB9Y7Ava9Y83LFV 04XZB8OZhg8VbGwK3HFFPi4BVFyUq9tMgwwLl5sC4fSL+12xzh62HByob2n0Blb/ sdh31kDpJl1clH/XQMZJJ4LcG7Im64DO8+xMbcCjH98=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=employees.org; h=subject :mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id :references:to; q=dns; s=selector1; b=qMd7wTC2loCJmyGkSOzxwnuilh OrjDO/CImhLgQrGcZxMoZQDSuftDn3+u27fIzKt4L18QGqx7f1MabNl9TVPa/irf OEe45I8NKUp+LmIjJ4K94iyEPR5vIV5mW16TrSMnvxpA1iOBeUG2DEHzNL2Hkzco mVpdDRmnvEGhb3tIw=
Received: from gomlefisk.localdomain (unknown [77.88.71.157]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: otroan) by banjo.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E07461FF; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 06:09:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by gomlefisk.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABEE13FAB03D; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 15:09:01 +0100 (CET)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D54276B6-F728-4219-A982-B72E968F0993"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b5
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <54F551A3.3020707@sonic.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 15:09:01 +0100
Message-Id: <3E8B0214-FEB7-4BAB-9F13-14248B7DDBAD@employees.org>
References: <86EF371E-55C4-4056-8569-B3844EE60137@employees.org> <54E4F01E.9030106@acm.org> <B3B010A5-7EE0-4898-B250-0FD931B84E97@employees.org> <54F551A3.3020707@sonic.net>
To: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@sonic.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/efficientnd-dt/VzDWdLTlr4G4_0m3-iGOu6dxQ_8>
Cc: 6man Chairs <6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org>, Andrew Yourtchenko <ayourtch@cisco.com>, "efficientnd-dt@ietf.org" <efficientnd-dt@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Efficientnd-dt] 6man IETF 92 Call for agenda items
X-BeenThere: efficientnd-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: 6man Efficient ND Design Team discussion list <efficientnd-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/efficientnd-dt>, <mailto:efficientnd-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/efficientnd-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:efficientnd-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:efficientnd-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/efficientnd-dt>, <mailto:efficientnd-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 14:09:22 -0000

Erik,

> Did you add two requests to the queue?
> One was for draft-nordmark-6man-rs-refresh and a separate one for draft-yourtchenko-6man-dad-issues?
> Either Andrew will present the second one remotely, or I can do it on site.

yes, thank you those are added.
15 minutes each. alternatively we make a design team session like we did last time?

cheers,
Ole

>>> On 18 Feb 2015, at 21:03 , Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> As part of the efficient-nd report in HNL we mentioned two drafts but they were not discussed at any depth:
>>> draft-yourtchenko-6man-dad-issues and draft-nordmark-6man-rs-refresh
>>> 
>>> I think it would make sense for Andrew to present the first one (he is cc'ed); including that request here to reserve some time on the agenda while we determine whether this is needed.
>>> The purpose of such a presentation would be to get an answer to what the WG wants to do about DAD. (See my reminder to the list today.)
>>> 
>>> draft-nordmark-6man-rs-refresh received some positive feedback in the room. I think a presentation + question whether to make it a WG draft makes sense. While the presentation can be short - 3-4 slides of substance might do it - it would be good to  time for discussion around making it a WG draft. So 15 minutes might be a reasonable.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>>   Erik
>>> 
>>> On 2/17/15 6:42 AM, Ole Troan wrote:
>>>> We have asked for a two and a half hour slot in Dallas for the 6MAN working group.
>>>> 
>>>> If you have a draft you would like to discuss, please send your request for agenda time to the 6man chairs.
>>>> Please include in the request, the title and file name of the draft, the speakers name (and email),
>>>> and how much time you need.
>>>> 
>>>> We will prioritise drafts that are working group items and drafts that have been actively discussed on the list.
>>>> 
>>>> We expect at least half the presentation time to be used for open discussion,
>>>> please plan your presentation accordingly.
>>>> 
>>>> New drafts not discussed on the mailing list prior to the meeting,
>>>> or drafts that do not appear to have support from the working group are unlikely to get time at the meeting.
>>>> 
>>>> Please have agenda items to us by 2015-03-09 and also note the draft deadline for IETF92:
>>>> 2015-03-09 (Monday): Internet Draft submission cut-off (for all drafts, including -00) by UTC 23:59
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Bob & Ole
>>>> 
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>>>> ipv6@ietf.org
>>>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>