Re: [Efficientnd-dt] 6man IETF 92 Call for agenda items

[Erik Nordmark <[e-mail]>]

On 3/10/15 5:37 PM, Bob Hinden wrote:
> Eric,
>
> Check the agenda we posted at:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/92/agenda/agenda-92-6man
>
> Let us know how you would like to change it.
That's fine.

We should be able to include at least a reference to dad-approaches in 
the dad issues slot.

    Erik

>
> Thanks,
> Bob
>
>
>> On Mar 10, 2015, at 2:39 PM, Erik Nordmark <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/10/15 1:31 PM, Ole Troan wrote:
>>> Erik,
>>>
>>> I also noticed draft-nordmark-6man-dad-approaches-00 is that something you’ll want to cover?
>> I/we can mention it briefly as part of the dad-issues slot. But it is more important to gauge what the WG thinks need to be improved with DAD first. Solution discussion should wait until after that.
>>
>>> right now we have 15 minutes reserved for each of.
>>>
>>> alternatively consider it a 30 minute session that you can split whichever way you like.
>> Some text missing above. I assume the dad-issues and rs-refresh is what you meant by "each of".
>>
>> Thanks,
>>    Erik
>>
>>> cheers,
>>> Ole
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 04 Mar 2015, at 2:05 , Erik Nordmark <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 3/3/15 6:09 AM, Ole Troan wrote:
>>>>> Erik,
>>>>>
>>>>>> Did you add two requests to the queue?
>>>>>> One was for draft-nordmark-6man-rs-refresh and a separate one for draft-yourtchenko-6man-dad-issues?
>>>>>> Either Andrew will present the second one remotely, or I can do it on site.
>>>>> yes, thank you those are added.
>>>>> 15 minutes each. alternatively we make a design team session like we did last time?
>>>> Better to keep them separate. They are both merely(?) outgrowths of the DT work.
>>>>
>>>>   Erik
>>>>
>>>>> cheers,
>>>>> Ole
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 18 Feb 2015, at 21:03 , Erik Nordmark <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As part of the efficient-nd report in HNL we mentioned two drafts but they were not discussed at any depth:
>>>>>>>> draft-yourtchenko-6man-dad-issues and draft-nordmark-6man-rs-refresh
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think it would make sense for Andrew to present the first one (he is cc'ed); including that request here to reserve some time on the agenda while we determine whether this is needed.
>>>>>>>> The purpose of such a presentation would be to get an answer to what the WG wants to do about DAD. (See my reminder to the list today.)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> draft-nordmark-6man-rs-refresh received some positive feedback in the room. I think a presentation + question whether to make it a WG draft makes sense. While the presentation can be short - 3-4 slides of substance might do it - it would be good to  time for discussion around making it a WG draft. So 15 minutes might be a reasonable.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>    Erik
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2/17/15 6:42 AM, Ole Troan wrote:
>>>>>>>>> We have asked for a two and a half hour slot in Dallas for the 6MAN working group.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you have a draft you would like to discuss, please send your request for agenda time to the 6man chairs.
>>>>>>>>> Please include in the request, the title and file name of the draft, the speakers name (and email),
>>>>>>>>> and how much time you need.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We will prioritise drafts that are working group items and drafts that have been actively discussed on the list.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We expect at least half the presentation time to be used for open discussion,
>>>>>>>>> please plan your presentation accordingly.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> New drafts not discussed on the mailing list prior to the meeting,
>>>>>>>>> or drafts that do not appear to have support from the working group are unlikely to get time at the meeting.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please have agenda items to us by 2015-03-09 and also note the draft deadline for IETF92:
>>>>>>>>> 2015-03-09 (Monday): Internet Draft submission cut-off (for all drafts, including -00) by UTC 23:59
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Bob & Ole
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>>>>>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>>>>>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Efficientnd-dt mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/efficientnd-dt
>> _______________________________________________
>> Efficientnd-dt mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/efficientnd-dt
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Efficientnd-dt mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/efficientnd-dt