Re: [Efficientnd-dt] 6man IETF 92 Call for agenda items

On 2/19/15 3:38 AM, Ole Troan wrote:
> Erik,
>
> Thank you. The request is added to the queue.

Ole,

Did you add two requests to the queue?
One was for draft-nordmark-6man-rs-refresh and a separate one for 
draft-yourtchenko-6man-dad-issues?
Either Andrew will present the second one remotely, or I can do it on site.

    Erik

>
> Best regards,
> Ole
>
>> On 18 Feb 2015, at 21:03 , Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> As part of the efficient-nd report in HNL we mentioned two drafts but they were not discussed at any depth:
>> draft-yourtchenko-6man-dad-issues and draft-nordmark-6man-rs-refresh
>>
>> I think it would make sense for Andrew to present the first one (he is cc'ed); including that request here to reserve some time on the agenda while we determine whether this is needed.
>> The purpose of such a presentation would be to get an answer to what the WG wants to do about DAD. (See my reminder to the list today.)
>>
>> draft-nordmark-6man-rs-refresh received some positive feedback in the room. I think a presentation + question whether to make it a WG draft makes sense. While the presentation can be short - 3-4 slides of substance might do it - it would be good to  time for discussion around making it a WG draft. So 15 minutes might be a reasonable.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>    Erik
>>
>> On 2/17/15 6:42 AM, Ole Troan wrote:
>>> We have asked for a two and a half hour slot in Dallas for the 6MAN working group.
>>>
>>> If you have a draft you would like to discuss, please send your request for agenda time to the 6man chairs.
>>> Please include in the request, the title and file name of the draft, the speakers name (and email),
>>> and how much time you need.
>>>
>>> We will prioritise drafts that are working group items and drafts that have been actively discussed on the list.
>>>
>>> We expect at least half the presentation time to be used for open discussion,
>>> please plan your presentation accordingly.
>>>
>>> New drafts not discussed on the mailing list prior to the meeting,
>>> or drafts that do not appear to have support from the working group are unlikely to get time at the meeting.
>>>
>>> Please have agenda items to us by 2015-03-09 and also note the draft deadline for IETF92:
>>> 2015-03-09 (Monday): Internet Draft submission cut-off (for all drafts, including -00) by UTC 23:59
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Bob & Ole
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>>> ipv6@ietf.org
>>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>