Re: [Efficientnd-dt] 6man IETF 92 Call for agenda items

[Bob Hinden <[e-mail]>]

Eric,

Check the agenda we posted at:

http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/92/agenda/agenda-92-6man

Let us know how you would like to change it.

Thanks,
Bob


> On Mar 10, 2015, at 2:39 PM, Erik Nordmark <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> On 3/10/15 1:31 PM, Ole Troan wrote:
>> Erik,
>> 
>> I also noticed draft-nordmark-6man-dad-approaches-00 is that something you’ll want to cover?
> I/we can mention it briefly as part of the dad-issues slot. But it is more important to gauge what the WG thinks need to be improved with DAD first. Solution discussion should wait until after that.
> 
>> right now we have 15 minutes reserved for each of.
>> 
>> alternatively consider it a 30 minute session that you can split whichever way you like.
> Some text missing above. I assume the dad-issues and rs-refresh is what you meant by "each of".
> 
> Thanks,
>   Erik
> 
>> 
>> cheers,
>> Ole
>> 
>> 
>>> On 04 Mar 2015, at 2:05 , Erik Nordmark <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 3/3/15 6:09 AM, Ole Troan wrote:
>>>> Erik,
>>>> 
>>>>> Did you add two requests to the queue?
>>>>> One was for draft-nordmark-6man-rs-refresh and a separate one for draft-yourtchenko-6man-dad-issues?
>>>>> Either Andrew will present the second one remotely, or I can do it on site.
>>>> yes, thank you those are added.
>>>> 15 minutes each. alternatively we make a design team session like we did last time?
>>> Better to keep them separate. They are both merely(?) outgrowths of the DT work.
>>> 
>>>  Erik
>>> 
>>>> cheers,
>>>> Ole
>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 18 Feb 2015, at 21:03 , Erik Nordmark <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> As part of the efficient-nd report in HNL we mentioned two drafts but they were not discussed at any depth:
>>>>>>> draft-yourtchenko-6man-dad-issues and draft-nordmark-6man-rs-refresh
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I think it would make sense for Andrew to present the first one (he is cc'ed); including that request here to reserve some time on the agenda while we determine whether this is needed.
>>>>>>> The purpose of such a presentation would be to get an answer to what the WG wants to do about DAD. (See my reminder to the list today.)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> draft-nordmark-6man-rs-refresh received some positive feedback in the room. I think a presentation + question whether to make it a WG draft makes sense. While the presentation can be short - 3-4 slides of substance might do it - it would be good to  time for discussion around making it a WG draft. So 15 minutes might be a reasonable.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>   Erik
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 2/17/15 6:42 AM, Ole Troan wrote:
>>>>>>>> We have asked for a two and a half hour slot in Dallas for the 6MAN working group.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> If you have a draft you would like to discuss, please send your request for agenda time to the 6man chairs.
>>>>>>>> Please include in the request, the title and file name of the draft, the speakers name (and email),
>>>>>>>> and how much time you need.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> We will prioritise drafts that are working group items and drafts that have been actively discussed on the list.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> We expect at least half the presentation time to be used for open discussion,
>>>>>>>> please plan your presentation accordingly.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> New drafts not discussed on the mailing list prior to the meeting,
>>>>>>>> or drafts that do not appear to have support from the working group are unlikely to get time at the meeting.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Please have agenda items to us by 2015-03-09 and also note the draft deadline for IETF92:
>>>>>>>> 2015-03-09 (Monday): Internet Draft submission cut-off (for all drafts, including -00) by UTC 23:59
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Bob & Ole
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>>>>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>>>>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Efficientnd-dt mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/efficientnd-dt
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Efficientnd-dt mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/efficientnd-dt