Re: [Efficientnd-dt] 6man IETF 92 Call for agenda items

[Ole Troan <[e-mail]>]

Erik,

I also noticed draft-nordmark-6man-dad-approaches-00 is that something you’ll want to cover?
right now we have 15 minutes reserved for each of.

alternatively consider it a 30 minute session that you can split whichever way you like.

cheers,
Ole


> On 04 Mar 2015, at 2:05 , Erik Nordmark <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> On 3/3/15 6:09 AM, Ole Troan wrote:
>> Erik,
>> 
>>> Did you add two requests to the queue?
>>> One was for draft-nordmark-6man-rs-refresh and a separate one for draft-yourtchenko-6man-dad-issues?
>>> Either Andrew will present the second one remotely, or I can do it on site.
>> yes, thank you those are added.
>> 15 minutes each. alternatively we make a design team session like we did last time?
> Better to keep them separate. They are both merely(?) outgrowths of the DT work.
> 
>  Erik
> 
>> 
>> cheers,
>> Ole
>> 
>>>>> On 18 Feb 2015, at 21:03 , Erik Nordmark <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> As part of the efficient-nd report in HNL we mentioned two drafts but they were not discussed at any depth:
>>>>> draft-yourtchenko-6man-dad-issues and draft-nordmark-6man-rs-refresh
>>>>> 
>>>>> I think it would make sense for Andrew to present the first one (he is cc'ed); including that request here to reserve some time on the agenda while we determine whether this is needed.
>>>>> The purpose of such a presentation would be to get an answer to what the WG wants to do about DAD. (See my reminder to the list today.)
>>>>> 
>>>>> draft-nordmark-6man-rs-refresh received some positive feedback in the room. I think a presentation + question whether to make it a WG draft makes sense. While the presentation can be short - 3-4 slides of substance might do it - it would be good to  time for discussion around making it a WG draft. So 15 minutes might be a reasonable.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>   Erik
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 2/17/15 6:42 AM, Ole Troan wrote:
>>>>>> We have asked for a two and a half hour slot in Dallas for the 6MAN working group.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> If you have a draft you would like to discuss, please send your request for agenda time to the 6man chairs.
>>>>>> Please include in the request, the title and file name of the draft, the speakers name (and email),
>>>>>> and how much time you need.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We will prioritise drafts that are working group items and drafts that have been actively discussed on the list.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We expect at least half the presentation time to be used for open discussion,
>>>>>> please plan your presentation accordingly.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> New drafts not discussed on the mailing list prior to the meeting,
>>>>>> or drafts that do not appear to have support from the working group are unlikely to get time at the meeting.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Please have agenda items to us by 2015-03-09 and also note the draft deadline for IETF92:
>>>>>> 2015-03-09 (Monday): Internet Draft submission cut-off (for all drafts, including -00) by UTC 23:59
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Bob & Ole
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>