Re: [Efficientnd-dt] 6man IETF 92 Call for agenda items

On Wed, 18 Feb 2015, Erik Nordmark wrote:

>
> As part of the efficient-nd report in HNL we mentioned two drafts but they 
> were not discussed at any depth:
> draft-yourtchenko-6man-dad-issues and draft-nordmark-6man-rs-refresh
>
> I think it would make sense for Andrew to present the first one (he is 
> cc'ed); including that request here to reserve some time on the agenda while 
> we determine whether this is needed.
> The purpose of such a presentation would be to get an answer to what the WG 
> wants to do about DAD. (See my reminder to the list today.)

I thought we had already presented it in a single-slide form during the 
design team update on the previous IETF ? (And the feedback I remember at 
least from Lorenzo was 'yeah it is not reliable and we don't want it 
reliable because evil operators').

IIRC there were no updates since then, but I can push a no-op refresh 
and present it remotely if needed (won't make it to Dallas for personal 
reasons).

>
> draft-nordmark-6man-rs-refresh received some positive feedback in the room. I 
> think a presentation + question whether to make it a WG draft makes sense. 
> While the presentation can be short - 3-4 slides of substance might do it - 
> it would be good to  time for discussion around making it a WG draft. So 15 
> minutes might be a reasonable.

+1 on this.

--a

>
> Thanks,
>   Erik
>
> On 2/17/15 6:42 AM, Ole Troan wrote:
>> We have asked for a two and a half hour slot in Dallas for the 6MAN working 
>> group.
>> 
>> If you have a draft you would like to discuss, please send your request for 
>> agenda time to the 6man chairs.
>> Please include in the request, the title and file name of the draft, the 
>> speakers name (and email),
>> and how much time you need.
>> 
>> We will prioritise drafts that are working group items and drafts that have 
>> been actively discussed on the list.
>> 
>> We expect at least half the presentation time to be used for open 
>> discussion,
>> please plan your presentation accordingly.
>> 
>> New drafts not discussed on the mailing list prior to the meeting,
>> or drafts that do not appear to have support from the working group are 
>> unlikely to get time at the meeting.
>> 
>> Please have agenda items to us by 2015-03-09 and also note the draft 
>> deadline for IETF92:
>> 2015-03-09 (Monday): Internet Draft submission cut-off (for all drafts, 
>> including -00) by UTC 23:59
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Bob & Ole
>> 
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>> ipv6@ietf.org
>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>