Re: [Efficientnd-dt] 6man IETF 92 Call for agenda items

[Erik Nordmark <[e-mail]>]

On 3/3/15 6:09 AM, Ole Troan wrote:
> Erik,
>
>> Did you add two requests to the queue?
>> One was for draft-nordmark-6man-rs-refresh and a separate one for draft-yourtchenko-6man-dad-issues?
>> Either Andrew will present the second one remotely, or I can do it on site.
> yes, thank you those are added.
> 15 minutes each. alternatively we make a design team session like we did last time?
Better to keep them separate. They are both merely(?) outgrowths of the 
DT work.

   Erik

>
> cheers,
> Ole
>
>>>> On 18 Feb 2015, at 21:03 , Erik Nordmark <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As part of the efficient-nd report in HNL we mentioned two drafts but they were not discussed at any depth:
>>>> draft-yourtchenko-6man-dad-issues and draft-nordmark-6man-rs-refresh
>>>>
>>>> I think it would make sense for Andrew to present the first one (he is cc'ed); including that request here to reserve some time on the agenda while we determine whether this is needed.
>>>> The purpose of such a presentation would be to get an answer to what the WG wants to do about DAD. (See my reminder to the list today.)
>>>>
>>>> draft-nordmark-6man-rs-refresh received some positive feedback in the room. I think a presentation + question whether to make it a WG draft makes sense. While the presentation can be short - 3-4 slides of substance might do it - it would be good to  time for discussion around making it a WG draft. So 15 minutes might be a reasonable.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>    Erik
>>>>
>>>> On 2/17/15 6:42 AM, Ole Troan wrote:
>>>>> We have asked for a two and a half hour slot in Dallas for the 6MAN working group.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you have a draft you would like to discuss, please send your request for agenda time to the 6man chairs.
>>>>> Please include in the request, the title and file name of the draft, the speakers name (and email),
>>>>> and how much time you need.
>>>>>
>>>>> We will prioritise drafts that are working group items and drafts that have been actively discussed on the list.
>>>>>
>>>>> We expect at least half the presentation time to be used for open discussion,
>>>>> please plan your presentation accordingly.
>>>>>
>>>>> New drafts not discussed on the mailing list prior to the meeting,
>>>>> or drafts that do not appear to have support from the working group are unlikely to get time at the meeting.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please have agenda items to us by 2015-03-09 and also note the draft deadline for IETF92:
>>>>> 2015-03-09 (Monday): Internet Draft submission cut-off (for all drafts, including -00) by UTC 23:59
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Bob & Ole
>>>>>
>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>