Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Suggestions for nomcom chair selection?

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 09 September 2020 20:48 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B753A0E4A for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 13:48:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.047
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.047 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.948, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0_SYcc9ag5IV for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 13:48:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1031.google.com (mail-pj1-x1031.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1031]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D0293A0E49 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 13:48:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1031.google.com with SMTP id n3so290141pjq.1 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 13:48:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=moGFQhpcgqGyGtg7hcxZabHbpB+m3dIVe8AQ09KMZMI=; b=tOn+VvM3WEMv3tSgQqy2gV1SuW8DrMgAb0O9ddkfqawSQpv2mHsAfOAR/cw5X6n+f6 pZSCbd4GZU44Km3iu3oLSOeuLUD0kPDds9ERyjB47iXzY+b9DW4/ZqhHiTnzWxEWMckr WywMRwWYfSg4NzqBQ/K4xnQxjO3q365Fly9svelpsNrOKymoCCDn/YCsrq2FxP0Xd4ei ZrtGOAOGNNNAA5lTRYnR3WCF8/A6+Mlo4IweBnfcfbFa8ARL8LAi5IJLuGZ1/XzCevqI LuES9UYl3F+WijEaDeIpNcFwV0IWt5aITUDIq7yfQc5DW6Vl6lXauxMn0INqQN+jxKkQ OkJQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=moGFQhpcgqGyGtg7hcxZabHbpB+m3dIVe8AQ09KMZMI=; b=q9l2r3QcKnrGiQbTRDFJGg2MIHzJu69r6/t1SWxGB7oWbpzz5h2rvO+bM9iuHaehgJ 81UfLMCqFOfsL4wwdyUY88BfHAagoIjsCuLHUeQxtp/QtDQEL219kOShv/RonSziGVeS c+7N/hhz4oAMaagU5SG9m0YCGG9+9ZL27ecmeNnr78ISEquUhDR4ryiXhTkK0gYET3fW tK3liHZVIH05Jm0n989uef5/ChLna+BS8WmAmSEkQxDVNft1TCnSqOcTGhMJM7xiYQjo LVGnGBI2cGG+U0/p5DO46QCuNB7kRvjCbO3VvstLbb2b0kj6bGm3FFRSgEdFBuZgnHF0 C9nQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530EH3LhiKzz3puT8e+8vQ31dNDxH4SWp/+2eEtWv/qGfvlbrkGB Dmk5Tpfuo78fHfzkwoD5Zd9ngUwK1fU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxQK0qISN3edJugfkpLfbLYiSD0oLmYeuMFfyKgQMN4ewtegA+ZyCFstB79/hMB1Iz+U66wfg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:a004:: with SMTP id q4mr2186935pjp.21.1599684507232; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 13:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([151.210.138.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ge12sm106434pjb.26.2020.09.09.13.48.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 09 Sep 2020 13:48:26 -0700 (PDT)
To: Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com>, eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
References: <20200814192145.iiuoma7a3frf7mm7@crankycanuck.ca> <006801d672e1$3a7989a0$af6c9ce0$@olddog.co.uk> <20200909180148.lr6ra2kgpsp3b4js@crankycanuck.ca> <9cebc2cb-656e-23ba-3e0f-996ed97de825@nthpermutation.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <06ee3274-1b45-5f31-75f4-6be80e372010@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 08:48:23 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9cebc2cb-656e-23ba-3e0f-996ed97de825@nthpermutation.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/1ILZZzuZFSNmDu-WwVK3YHjTjQc>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Suggestions for nomcom chair selection?
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 20:48:29 -0000

On 10-Sep-20 08:28, Michael StJohns wrote:
> On 9/9/2020 2:01 PM, 'Andrew Sullivan' wrote:
>>
>> I am not by nature inclined to throw away things that are working, but 
>> I think some of the recent discussions I have observed in the IETF 
>> (and elsewhere) make me wonder what "working" means.  I must say, 
>> speaking personally, certain recent discussion have made me feel 
>> terribly alienated from the IETF and make me question my suitability 
>> to appoint anyone to any position of any kind.  I think that can only 
>> get worse over time, since I can no longer make useful contributions 
>> to the work of the IETF (assuming I ever was able to) and so will 
>> inevitably be out of touch with good current candidates. 
> 
> 
> As I was re-reading this thread, I came up with a fairly strange idea.
> 
> Let's let the Nomcom select the next Nomcom chair, 

That occurred to me to, by a slightly different path:

"Oh, it seems like we need a nominating committee for the NomCom
Chair, how can we do that?"

> with the approval of 
> the IAB and IESG.

No, I don't think so. That's a bit too close to self-perpetuation.
Stick to confirmation & announcement by the ISOC President, with
some words that allow the latter to push back if they see a problem.

Alternatively: Leave it with the ISOC President, but with an advisory
committee consisting of (say) the last 3 NomCom chairs.

    Brian

> 
> Minimum ( non-waivable) qualifications:  Must have served on the Nomcom 
> within the last 6 years (not including the current one). Must not have 
> served as chair within the last 10. Must have at least 2 up votes  
> (recommendations) from people (voting members?) who were on their same 
> Nomcom.  Must not be working for the same company as any of the previous 
> 5 chairs were when they served as chairs.  (Each of those numbers is 
> arbitrary - can be twiddled for balance - here just as a suggested 
> starting point)
> 
> Later, Mike
> 
>