IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Fwd: The "eligibility" list, and a virtual meeting

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Thu, 19 September 2019 11:41 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68B41200E9 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 04:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wuvl3xG9TXRK for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 04:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22AAA120013 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 04:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.115.140.165]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id x8JBfgin005117 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 19 Sep 2019 04:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1568893315; x=1568979715; i=@elandsys.com; bh=6zpvVK3Nymx5Hnb0JhEac0mXIQbxBIluSC00VEyNPB0=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=zrtGEVkJGpbtjyzH5PfKyGtkqDX8uuTZBMzqU8Y4x4yu8BlgXQc9draXuozC9AV99 xm+c14MU9oeRJYK+oEuu5dahof6Ur/iAaN8/E25Akie+b7TUyBDBJSuVw4/r1QOsBp OafoxdB6kIlSlOmL/pyuTTB6xEmKcztaRLN8d31k=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20190919041535.11080360@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 04:40:47 -0700
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk, eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <04d201d56e67$7813d470$683b7d50$@olddog.co.uk>
References: <CALaySJ+BEoDd5aas9VfAmfcF+H_54w4ETNafVwFAObhY_A2v-Q@mail.gmail.com> <C90E6D6D-D058-40A5-AA3B-2D2002077016@episteme.net> <CALaySJJggQqYhVHSdKCx4BvpiR31oodx9C9NkzfMoFGbUv+gmg@mail.gmail.com> <939D2A7C64A58595AD2B9CBD@PSB> <CABcZeBNxVgJE=jv7+Zf6RjkG3r-+00zuMQ=2mtESrP4skkPgzQ@mail.gmail.com> <4A244E1EFA8D1821D2D49ABD@PSB> <CABcZeBNmT2ONMacUiVsjUuR=cHz=fAog3ojNuhrD7P0eqQbOSQ@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20190918125334.13e73f70@elandnews.com> <e1e2687f-bdba-edca-b3e8-247ca35ba0a5@nomountain.net> <04d201d56e67$7813d470$683b7d50$@olddog.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/1VrOACK3fDMW4tE42zY4miuJdVc>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Fwd: The "eligibility" list, and a virtual meeting
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 11:41:58 -0000

Hi Adrian,
At 02:24 PM 18-09-2019, Adrian Farrel wrote:
>But, I confess, I read Ekr's comment as though he was saying that 
>the existence of a recall process was pointless because NomCom 
>exists. That is certainly a question that could be discussed, but 
>not the one (I think) that SM raised in his draft.

The draft does not discuss whether having a recall process was 
pointless or not.  I am okay if anyone wishes to discuss that.  For 
what it is worth, that topic [1] is usually listed under "failure of 
accountability".

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

1. The topic is about mechanisms which, when taken together, create 
incentives for responsible decision making.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email