Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Virtual BoF for draft-moonesamy-recall-rev

That's nice. I like the clarity.

I also like that the worms are kept firmly in their cans. It is without
doubt that a hundred other issues concerning the recall process could be
aired, and I am certain that many people have different hot issues. But I
firmly believe that addressing a few at a time is the best (only!) way to
make progress.

If it turns out that there is support for resolving any of these three
issues, they can be quickly picked off and we can move on to other issues if
there is interest. If there is no support for addressing these three
concerns, then they can be put to one side and work can start on other
issues if there is interest.

For my part, I think that all three issues should be addressed, and I think
that the approaches suggested in SM's draft are a good starting point for
discussion.

Thanks,
Adrian

-----Original Message-----
From: Eligibility-discuss <eligibility-discuss-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf
Of S Moonesamy
Sent: 11 June 2019 11:45
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>;
eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>; Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>;
Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Virtual BoF for
draft-moonesamy-recall-rev

Hi Suresh,

Please see a revised version of the BOF proposal to address your comments:

Problem statement

      The current description of the process for initiating petitions 
for recalls
      for NomCom-appointed roles is described in RFC 7437 and is 
being updated in
      draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7437bis.  The scope of this work addresses only
three
      specific issues with the petition process; other parts of the 
recall model
      and other ways of removing Nomcom-appointees are explicitly out of
scope.

      The three issues are:

      - Ineligibility of remote participants to seek redress through the
        recall process;

      - Reducing the number of signatories for a recall petition;

      - Ineligibility of IAB and IESG Members and other Nomcom
        Appointees to sign a recall petition.

The purpose of the BOF is to examine the above-mentioned issues and
determine,
for each, whether it is sufficient interest and importance. 
draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
is a possible starting point for the effort.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

-- 
Eligibility-discuss mailing list
Eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss