Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Discussion at gendispatch?

"Pete Resnick" <resnick@episteme.net> Wed, 06 November 2019 18:02 UTC

Return-Path: <resnick@episteme.net>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F0E120100 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 10:02:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gm2EGd86mvWn for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 10:02:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from episteme.net (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EB06120090 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 10:02:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66F4A93529BA; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 12:02:33 -0600 (CST)
Received: from episteme.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (episteme.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tuiZYEusdT6W; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 12:02:30 -0600 (CST)
Received: from [172.16.1.18] (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C27D593529B0; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 12:02:30 -0600 (CST)
From: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Cc: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 12:02:30 -0600
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13r5655)
Message-ID: <1A26C4AF-E579-4215-AC2C-0E470616DC63@episteme.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20191106061852.12a70190@elandnews.com>
References: <A809A60C-D235-479D-8239-85332AC0569B@episteme.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20191106061852.12a70190@elandnews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; markup="markdown"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/6P9CCzsgXjThvbroZZRX7yNwWhE>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Discussion at gendispatch?
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 18:02:38 -0000

On 6 Nov 2019, at 8:29, S Moonesamy wrote:

> Hi Pete,
> At 05:22 AM 06-11-2019, Pete Resnick wrote:
>> Chatting with the ADs, we thought it might be useful to take a bit of 
>> agenda time at the gendispatch meeting to discuss whether the 
>> eligibility work is going to simply need AD sponsorship, or a new WG, 
>> or no action, or... Thoughts? The gendispatch meeting is Mon, 18 Nov 
>> at 18:10 Singapore Time (10:10 UTC, 05:10 US Eastern Time, 14:10 
>> Mauritius Time). Are the authors available (and sufficiently awake) 
>> at that time in order to participate?
>
> Thanks for reaching out.  I'll attend the WG session remotely.  Could 
> draft-moonesamy-recall-rev (it expires on November 16) be placed on 
> the agenda?

Of course, though I'm sure if you submitted a new version just to 
prevent expiration, Barry would go ahead and approve it.

I think I can do a quick summary of the document and the conclusions of 
the virtual meeting, and you can join the meetecho to answer any 
questions.

pr
-- 
Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
All connections to the world are tenuous at best