Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom eligibility & IETF 107 (fwd) Scott Mansfield: RE: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com> Tue, 31 March 2020 16:41 UTC
Return-Path: <victor@jvknet.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 142E73A242C for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 09:41:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.004
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.004 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=jvknet-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3lFhXPy5uumP for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 09:41:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x335.google.com (mail-wm1-x335.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::335]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 672AE3A242B for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 09:41:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x335.google.com with SMTP id e9so3572063wme.4 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 09:41:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jvknet-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=E8Redwyv/EID8d5Z0eeygBmEmcn70+aWG2zdPQ9vXsc=; b=mvqNP3oK8WSPgGEg0Pw4l79KV3S0zMumqabl0YuJd+42QwaLyMUDB0Ig5ZqhnxNLwd LwdyLMqkCirl9AIx3i750Bkk4V4Hdw6y9A0XQ/5ixvihsgyu5LxyahvMBfFS4L0TJPjX HIUVBkWYED9Gj+oj4SW20+DeFqnvAC6m9aOwWYZr7QR+k8b9mpt9fP9UTYXRBs4ZOyYq T65jTfFhKZDnjC6zyk8G48igSKcuF7wDfYya3n3rbXe0pnaLALSSkM/4MvSQt6iVTH1a Ll9JR0vpW36HzJod7vH0Uo1NNgjxKjec2yPxTRhsd1AoIPvM9FMcUxhz9Jv/V/8RmnbE tZhQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=E8Redwyv/EID8d5Z0eeygBmEmcn70+aWG2zdPQ9vXsc=; b=U6YhPka1zYFGRpaSTxFIkUECW3TvndIuQZQ5E1PMxwaVq2S84c9sZp/ja+RfI1iaOd umODrONX7uulKuOBhF7DlFSvu0pPkw9illSucEiQNpSekOGFCWrFKwPqPOLwKWrA2xRZ bCReGrAkUkv0rCfK72YiNOSjUqyTilayYkA4Lj8irD7wwOPHup+w4BV28ULygWSv5OZH omWD+da1K3HGL4u+nmrKSjBjGZI8OTt3W2b00azwD6VEkPbWFDubPU/5ScD8XH1M9lAd GqdlmzsdDS1SnGqeJwWbyDY0TVHBOKr4j2xelk1qJOE8fD1q7aP7SDLVroeDKL06w4yu 8y3A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0Pub6oezH6SyiGSvYlf+lGPgltgitE5bimxX3XtW0HJydkO8aOKEM NIXpaWrJayecmUoRLxu7yRm31v6MBQQY8air6L+fKg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIV1OdEG0O2Dx039h/RSE9K6lt2zcAHsOILoZs0z6pLfY1Fr1CtSmzWcAZvLSIUjd8/B9pMMgDMlFfCGEObRTk=
X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c7c7:: with SMTP id z7mr614959wmk.142.1585672912680; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 09:41:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <28433.1585520758@localhost> <CAJc3aaNs2DipcSAdddB1PayPSFN+zRPDwyKog_LhjTu4B95afg@mail.gmail.com> <28427.1585618693@localhost> <CAJc3aaPkfAAhPLwPhKfikjhg=15AopFntGJefhLd7t9=a-fJkQ@mail.gmail.com> <0A2F31BE-4FC6-4CBF-9C29-7372A92242A8@fugue.com> <CAJc3aaOzHOsohZ60zLo5H3vR=M6LJv7MgcymyDZrX0xSSCX5aw@mail.gmail.com> <73ABAF20-EABA-4341-B992-981B72664529@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <73ABAF20-EABA-4341-B992-981B72664529@fugue.com>
From: Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 12:41:41 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJc3aaMaJo8Sx33R1gjEPRKxW1b4rAW_Dc7q7WURii0BBgncyA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b0cd2805a2293ee8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/7H6rGTpN5xyusUj0VHI7lRQYHOU>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom eligibility & IETF 107 (fwd) Scott Mansfield: RE: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 16:41:56 -0000
Ted, On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 12:30 PM Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote: > On Mar 31, 2020, at 12:29 PM, Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com> wrote: > > That works too, but would in theory change something retroactively. I am > not opposed, but it may be open to post selection challenge (i.e. > using rules we set after the fact). > > > I don’t think it changes anything. The last five in-person meetings were > IETFs 102-107. > Well it does make IETF102 a consideration vs. IETF107. How relevant that is to folks I am not 100% sure. It's a valid option which may have missed IETF102 but planned to attend IETF107 in-person and so happened dto want to be on Nomcom (however unlikely that would be). regards, Victor K
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom eligibility & IE… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom eligibility & IE… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom eligibility & IE… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom eligibility & IE… Ted Lemon
- [Eligibility-discuss] ways to advance the discuss… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom eligibility & IE… Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom eligibility & IE… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom eligibility & IE… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom eligibility & IE… Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom eligibility & IE… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom eligibility & IE… Loa Andersson
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom eligibility & IE… Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom eligibility & IE… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom eligibility & IE… Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom eligibility & IE… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom eligibility & IE… Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom eligibility & IE… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom eligibility & IE… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom eligibility & IE… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] ways to advance the dis… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] ways to advance the dis… Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom eligibility & IE… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] ways to advance the dis… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] ways to advance the dis… Stephen Farrell