IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Virtual BoF for draft-moonesamy-recall-rev

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Tue, 11 June 2019 16:24 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A03D8120321 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 09:24:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=dWp0PFgR; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=4pWgM7X5
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V8YcJEDNlbjI for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 09:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8265D12032B for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 09:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([197.227.86.213]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x5BGNbQH000431 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 11 Jun 2019 09:23:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1560270234; x=1560356634; bh=CK3eagbJ4euK799r43CxhL9avFHKlqXY9mc+Bb8jIvU=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=dWp0PFgRhZp5Jynhvk1qurL7K/zSBC8cOBkYxhY3E892LS7oxUjPY02tBRabILYnv uK10jIWj5rAgQB0QOEn58T4CaRXd9aRs3rHd1tnIm9+UjyHRF6R8MGCwq4cgN+gGpT E3dRsQmf66Z+icypDaO/Uz49Zk8abcZMkNQzToFc=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1560270234; x=1560356634; i=@elandsys.com; bh=CK3eagbJ4euK799r43CxhL9avFHKlqXY9mc+Bb8jIvU=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=4pWgM7X57hfy6Zz/IvpNuvwHLstiEWQiB+QLe0tQb4qDui7qq0Kl/TirThJoL3+8j 7l6dmm54TsgwtX4HKsg375ZXaNEdlcQylxXHboocpZD0fWP3cvn+WtUGZg1t4Dx6D8 6r3LQW0DIGyJe1It4rb2nzg4599RRHhsMwS2O02c=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20190611090352.08372f80@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 09:15:34 -0700
To: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>, eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Cc: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOdDvNpCbkXU69X6PCfJ9q8cG-RA+mPHzWu=ga-Yq_0nMV_-+w@mail.g mail.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20190525144314.0e72bb68@elandnews.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20190601204707.0bf89070@elandnews.com> <D58B591C-9140-4273-AA11-59E2EBD101FE@gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20190611033500.0c619e48@elandnews.com> <065101d52047$d35ea620$7a1bf260$@olddog.co.uk> <CABcZeBOX3PURx57jE1poyBt-VxdbVbcFp-E+eocPMH6fsBq6qw@mail.gmail.com> <1AE7F6A0-F278-42A5-9E55-4DA94A38CB01@cisco.com> <CABcZeBMbGOA09rRVuq2WK6SJ-pK8hAjxgMz5EaBm5-h9RGLk3g@mail.gmail.com> <066801d52053$650ea290$2f2be7b0$@olddog.co.uk> <CABcZeBMzca2JGBMtuURnHp4UomSbkwmLUmaW2OEeMTZF-Wfw3w@mail.gmail.com> <CAOdDvNpCbkXU69X6PCfJ9q8cG-RA+mPHzWu=ga-Yq_0nMV_-+w@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/7JLX1A2l3rH2nC3QpWxDDB2Zibk>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:34:05 -0700
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Virtual BoF for draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 16:24:11 -0000

Hi Patrick,
At 08:48 AM 11-06-2019, Patrick McManus wrote:
>The larger question is about enfranchisement. but its not really 
>about recalls in any special way. This is an important question and, 
>while the various tradeoffs are

The intent was to put in an effort which is sustainable instead of 
tackling larger questions without any proposal in sight and which 
would require a huge effort.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email