IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Eligibility-discuss] some numbers

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 22 April 2020 01:33 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83823A096B for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 18:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VwntE_p2fDjC for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 18:33:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf29.google.com (mail-qv1-xf29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2F883A0969 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 18:33:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf29.google.com with SMTP id p13so148409qvt.12 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 18:33:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=9Nmfkn563GpsaHobvBUKJ+4KC6WYeEOqIBqEVms0YrA=; b=cmZ+ichwT0Wd9Wz7DmQgTW5jyIcOkqShR4aFnF4/qM9Ce9Sf/4kcej5y4YMpI/FqHP DS2VvCaQ/rfUdKDnBnmXdNGOvD97XOi0HUFRVwJTURSQQwSL6/XlHbU/mNbczVebpI6y uRPGZPh9O3/fydTGht7IowQ+SQ6THgtXnRTXlou5QLplPuL2uok/vvD2/G2BLg+MEdmz M/QdQcpYin0fmw6MfvMlLM7oskOuoSRI4CRREW3x0CjgrkTrezymHeWpDQNYplHyzptU HlmyG2Lo+EDUGhZ78VCOTbSObBZYo4y0SEnFJN63KwBuPC6akAW/c9hkfhlkB12liJvu Zm4w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=9Nmfkn563GpsaHobvBUKJ+4KC6WYeEOqIBqEVms0YrA=; b=A6CMyxYy3BUU8Y+HK6ZReRQEiEA8QM+DjuO4jFXWN/Oks8NvpQ0QslQSqa8Nh+Xuaa FyK/9zcF5S/eWHyGXWmmNsjzgBZnRRWs2QXJM0MLyEDe2E8GuRCppYMmouX3mnwsLZN/ pibWjHtmtCmJ4t9lNOjhk2VK3wF/n2YEqRCdpo+Nmpbgyl8IhrQkOZidu/ocYCNSsO8J mjjE8COVNgMk89PPz5cUFD0+3ZLhsyInWVrGfALWB8rPRqkJ8XSogDsR4l8BhjumcEkd kBrJuKyGCyWuntgrk7DpGjZIC+QJpfxnklWe73AhGMHvt5NXptNAZONGly0rSsnd9KdC 0FvQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0Pubzas25geqovP0pvOFw5Aw38wQC0JlhMj9gdBfU4o50dRUyL4bA aULxwDerglfrLqtT+1ayGRQuZ83w/4U=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJUBymT0nNqJDCSUMGg8mK+/vomSrMu794Be1RB7KvbiXQL2gAppcJTmcv9TB9V8U5xSRn4BA==
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:562e:: with SMTP id cb14mr22015141qvb.249.1587519181992; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 18:33:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:18b:300:36ee:ed12:e051:9d48:1b62? ([2601:18b:300:36ee:ed12:e051:9d48:1b62]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j8sm3036138qtk.85.2020.04.21.18.33.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 21 Apr 2020 18:33:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <BDD6E023-D24D-4AB2-AC6D-7F833AB84362@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_FCE81206-F802-4103-8D1F-27045834D81F"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3636.0.1\))
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 21:33:00 -0400
In-Reply-To: <0fc1f65f-8df7-0844-001d-048a310ff152@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: "eligibility-discuss@ietf.org" <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <1f887326-339d-078f-e718-71ca090f762c@cs.tcd.ie> <C5D4414C-80C8-465A-AF5A-9485BE748BFA@fugue.com> <63a8511a-f727-d0e8-b3ce-6c81ac547eec@cs.tcd.ie> <2FFA69FB-D429-4C5E-B504-2E34EE4E647A@fugue.com> <0fc1f65f-8df7-0844-001d-048a310ff152@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3636.0.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/AK5sgZQSg8jUH9zWZuMt092fKa0>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] some numbers
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 01:33:05 -0000

On Apr 21, 2020, at 9:20 PM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
> The above is only true if we don't have more f2f meetings.
> If those re-start in 2021 then many people who travel will
> not lose eligibility. If those don't restart, as-is we'd
> have nobody eligible. So it's not the scheme in draft-02
> that'd be disenfranchising anyone, but rather covid-19.
> 
> Our draft *only* enfranchises people.

That's a fair point, I guess, but you could also say that if we take no action, it will disenfranchise literally everyone.  So while I am sorry if my framing seemed unkind, the reason I didn’t think to frame differently is that the only thing I am really more concerned with is the outcome—I don’t care who is to blame. :)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email