IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Eligibility-discuss] don't repeat what's not changing in 8713: Ineligibility by being a board/group member.

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Tue, 20 September 2022 14:28 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 920A7C15258D for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 07:28:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.086
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.086 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gIldgC7bNHa1 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 07:28:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15C58C14F726 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 07:28:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.102] ([47.186.48.51]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPSA id 28KESDFk080263 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 20 Sep 2022 09:28:14 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1663684094; bh=eOVJJ/JAVAfWl8yUw69VpVlZ1LMN6aVTI/F2gCk9ZPE=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=MU+PC96JNT4R9YC9N6HYnuDG0eHTDq0mukhECKgt/sUOgN6UBUHV3JMtcwSzotpXZ M4fX0QZJgw2WQA/geAT+iGe78NKFdZue16x81xbUyAgU27aNZZypWD4Dr8AysdsWlY bPUdPHhnE2SCcN2hQDj7DCt6PIGVYo+BMltgwv1k=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.48.51] claimed to be [192.168.1.102]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------9LSJ0rLviCCwhUoLLLouhTtB"
Message-ID: <75c01ef9-8384-2784-c14d-7781ff51657c@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 09:28:08 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>, eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
References: <CAM4esxSNzWQ1+0ppjTeOqnUvju09-Nshm7sWq_Yx=u5YikJT=g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM4esxSNzWQ1+0ppjTeOqnUvju09-Nshm7sWq_Yx=u5YikJT=g@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/FgiAE8-xWIgQRp63AomZp-G6Nj4>
Subject: [Eligibility-discuss] don't repeat what's not changing in 8713: Ineligibility by being a board/group member.
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF eligibility procedures <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 14:28:21 -0000

I think this has been poked at a little before - apologies if I'm 
retreading:

In the introduction, this sentence is out of place - I suggest simply 
removing it, as it's covered unchanged in RFC8713.

Current members of the Internet Society Board of Trustees, IETF Trust, LLC Board, IAB, and IESG are ineligible.

If this document needs to call that out, give some hint of why, and move 
it out of the paragraph that it is currently in.

RjS

(p.s. Not a PR yet because I don't know if there was a why for calling 
that out)

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status