IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: Notification for draft-eastlake-rfc3797bis-00.txt

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Mon, 22 May 2023 13:59 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C37AC151525 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 May 2023 06:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JeCm3FGc5RqW for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 May 2023 06:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A19F6C151085 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 May 2023 06:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122333.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 34M8wp5X025054; Mon, 22 May 2023 14:59:13 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=IPCvRXxXfZCG+DpqAwI+4uy+X/D/v27+/kitaRUhhIc=; b=JpUyhlV3zIkPi28Ej2mveXgNp0w9zUdce07p7Vx4eD2NEB4SVYgzn3uJpcgo9bcuzKrA K+qdtTK0pewbGxwBSJ1j6KkjNcy+EYBb3VYW4t6o90FCrv4P+Yqbps0Yw3crkgFZ9lZO s3pPgqwWF0ozUBf3AfwtpNiU/WQ5919AB+6QqAsCagGuiQnCr0KklMnWw9OUCNL8E0FX uEqyVntIwRBEBI1Brn4oeg5C65+CureOnHJmSUvEGFOBubuj2rHDKs6C7gfe62Mlvowl w+V/SqPFlENsC0DMdWoI0tbMVcAA/EuA/8mGVTjO8Ivh+GTD7h1uzS7TeJpbP6gM9zHQ oA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint7 (a72-247-45-33.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [72.247.45.33] (may be forged)) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3qpnfc7gts-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 22 May 2023 14:59:13 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 34MBN8Y4000912; Mon, 22 May 2023 09:59:12 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.204]) by prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3qpshwbmac-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 22 May 2023 09:59:12 -0400
Received: from ustx2ex-dag4mb7.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.50.206) by ustx2ex-dag4mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.50.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1118.26; Mon, 22 May 2023 06:59:12 -0700
Received: from ustx2ex-dag4mb7.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.206]) by ustx2ex-dag4mb7.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.206]) with mapi id 15.02.1118.026; Mon, 22 May 2023 06:59:12 -0700
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
CC: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, "eligibility-discuss@ietf.org" <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: Notification for draft-eastlake-rfc3797bis-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHZjJmmJB2RHpi2e0Sy6tVu3e8e9K9mdLCAgABKpgD//8TsgA==
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 13:59:11 +0000
Message-ID: <B14D1209-66EC-47A9-9C15-2755FD7BD780@akamai.com>
References: <54F373CD-1E97-42BC-9AAB-0451ABD9D448@eggert.org> <889212B2-B102-4F37-96F5-63EC994EFA04@akamai.com> <CABcZeBOXbp7vmA1JsNx53c=X1d5n2Oqt-5nFWoqLkc0dJR+9rQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBOXbp7vmA1JsNx53c=X1d5n2Oqt-5nFWoqLkc0dJR+9rQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.73.23051401
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B14D120966EC47A99C152755FD7BD780akamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.254,Aquarius:18.0.957,Hydra:6.0.573,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2023-05-22_09,2023-05-22_03,2023-05-22_02
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=668 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2304280000 definitions=main-2305220115
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: F_n1BpxhInSnyUpgsxbAf8K3gnMJgfsN
X-Proofpoint-GUID: F_n1BpxhInSnyUpgsxbAf8K3gnMJgfsN
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.254,Aquarius:18.0.957,Hydra:6.0.573,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2023-05-22_09,2023-05-22_03,2023-05-22_02
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=600 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2304280000 definitions=main-2305220116
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/G97l7b0STWuoBADPXnF8M4iYwk0>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: Notification for draft-eastlake-rfc3797bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF eligibility procedures <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 13:59:24 -0000

I'm not sure that this is in fact the consensus of those who have been
in nomcom. For instance, I've been liaison twice, and I don't agree.

That is a good point.  I’m not aware that any full NomCom has ever been asked that.

Perhaps you mean "those who have been nomcom chair", but I'm not sure
that that's really the relevant constituency for this decision, which, after all,
is about community legitimacy, rather than minimizing work for the chair.

Sure, it should be the community consensus.  But I do take exception to your ending phrase. I never once said “this is easier for me.”  The only issue I ever raised was the time it would take, and the impact on the schedule. In fact, I was quite diligent about performing all the steps should I have come to that.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email