IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Virtual BoF for draft-moonesamy-recall-rev

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sat, 25 May 2019 22:22 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 851D512007C for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 May 2019 15:22:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sP5Ed-qhWGT6 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 May 2019 15:22:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta7.iomartmail.com (mta7.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 495D112002F for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 May 2019 15:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (vs3.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.124]) by mta7.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x4PMLJMf025023; Sat, 25 May 2019 23:21:19 +0100
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED7A22203A; Sat, 25 May 2019 23:21:18 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs3.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D85F022032; Sat, 25 May 2019 23:21:18 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([87.113.128.179]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x4PMLHHW016140 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 25 May 2019 23:21:18 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'Salz, Rich'" <rsalz@akamai.com>, 'S Moonesamy' <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20190525144314.0e72bb68@elandnews.com> <FDDEFD82-E276-4874-896E-490397EDA735@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <FDDEFD82-E276-4874-896E-490397EDA735@akamai.com>
Date: Sat, 25 May 2019 23:21:16 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <062f01d51348$2be9e6e0$83bdb4a0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQFR42vyAucRjBtXO+m4xnaMV3ichgJA58sUp3DBQ5A=
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 87.113.128.179
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-24638.003
X-TM-AS-Result: No--10.627-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--10.627-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-24638.003
X-TMASE-Result: 10--10.626700-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: VfovoVrt/obxIbpQ8BhdbL1Zdxpk/SkcuqgVqRoQsiCyRg7+bGPTdrbE 3ByWTBPiO8u97ZRuxBQxuLW4s2FAOOVsdeNpdvi/+U1sobHhDtQx8U5ikIj+4juwTDpX8ii0THK WCmR2jKUyUIPnDlNiCsYGS5HBZwU48oWuLhK0Tf38OMEMU7OyZqUB+KILVUD9RQgyInUyrWIQp2 GRJnINDRMEv24kX1CIY4pQ/oxFQy813zPr5rpaObzgL/eLACDEZ4oybycKGSYObIrZ0cF8LA/gN 7zduuYXrY81Gk+qTQWRk6XtYogiarQ/aqQZTRfKU6baA36eiazEQdG7H66TyH4gKq42LRYkIpxB 5lCgo5xTv5hUdD2qgvOiqsrlYiAOvN3gOplWA/d+3BndfXUhXQ==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/H6DgTXctTKxHsS91VUJLiJwHpZg>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Virtual BoF for draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 May 2019 22:22:03 -0000

My understanding of 7437bis is that the updates are intended to take account
of the LLC changes only and that "re-opening cans of worms" was off the
agenda.

Of course, 7437bis is transitioning from the IASA2 working group to being an
IAB document, so the scope could change, I suppose. But I would hope that
discussion of NomCom remains a community consensus document, not an IAB
document.

Best,
Adrian

-----Original Message-----
From: Eligibility-discuss <eligibility-discuss-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf
Of Salz, Rich
Sent: 25 May 2019 23:05
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>; eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Virtual BoF for
draft-moonesamy-recall-rev

       The current description of the process for handling recalls of
       NomCom-appointed roles is described in RFC 7437 and is being updated
in
       draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7437bis.  ...


So why is your draft not appropriate to be discussed as part of the 7437bis
document?

If your draft becomes an RFC at some point, do you expect it to say "updates
7437bis" ?



-- 
Eligibility-discuss mailing list
Eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email