IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Discussion at gendispatch?

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 06 November 2019 14:30 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 338971208B4 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 06:30:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PO0bJrbsERkq for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 06:30:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E2E1200F9 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 06:30:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.115.177.101]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id xA6EUbtw017424 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 6 Nov 2019 06:30:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1573050648; x=1573137048; i=@elandsys.com; bh=LxFI/oYABbV8GhOWTxh1f3zpKLyesGfp7vu5kAVz4Dk=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=0/Q1BL5QeSFpqNP3TJubnlZDvDeW+7lDUcoLNjcXTePq6/RKmy+YdIx4CevKkfiv5 3n26//PwXthzLXeomW0WZzEwKWcAYqT2uhObFm2SIo5MVRBINhEFZaekO4GAVKmoHm 8VE78ZyV9QcVoIDBmEJLzoPen+jPiuco8j98fl+4=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20191106061852.12a70190@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 06:29:19 -0800
To: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>, eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <A809A60C-D235-479D-8239-85332AC0569B@episteme.net>
References: <A809A60C-D235-479D-8239-85332AC0569B@episteme.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/KAL97j7WlFMLCni8_wrbpqRt3sk>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Discussion at gendispatch?
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 14:30:58 -0000

Hi Pete,
At 05:22 AM 06-11-2019, Pete Resnick wrote:
>Chatting with the ADs, we thought it might be useful to take a bit 
>of agenda time at the gendispatch meeting to discuss whether the 
>eligibility work is going to simply need AD sponsorship, or a new 
>WG, or no action, or... Thoughts? The gendispatch meeting is Mon, 18 
>Nov at 18:10 Singapore Time (10:10 UTC, 05:10 US Eastern Time, 14:10 
>Mauritius Time). Are the authors available (and sufficiently awake) 
>at that time in order to participate?

Thanks for reaching out.  I'll attend the WG session remotely.  Could 
draft-moonesamy-recall-rev (it expires on November 16) be placed on the agenda?

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email