Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Handling the fear of "bogus" recall petitions

I was remote for the Montreal IETF, and I needed my registration number in
order to log into Meetecho as a participant for WG sessions, so I could be
included in the blue sheets for sessions where I was a participant.

You are correct in that you don't need a registration number to just use
Meetecho as an observer.

> I would think that the official list would be the one from the
secretariat.
> If we are going to do all this work, then let's do it for the selection
> committee too.

+1

Cheers,
Andy

On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 11:07 AM Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
wrote:

>
> S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:
>     >> Section 2.2 about Remote Participants tells me nothing about how the
>     >> criteria would apply.  Registered remotely... but did they pick up
>     >> their badge?  (Because I think the secretariat removes people from
> the
>     >> list who didn't show up in person)
>
>     > The IETF 105 attendance list has 861 remote participants.  The list
> is
>     > probably incorrect as there isn't a last name or first name for Row
> 1.
>     > It should be possible to get a list of remote attendees from
> Meetecho.
>     > Are there "blue sheets" for remote participants?
>
> 1) You can participate on Meetecho without registered.
>    (I guess we agree that they don't count)
>
> 2) You can register as a remote an never join a single Meetecho.
>
> 3) You can register as a remote user, but then not login to Meetecho, and
>    then you won't get counted as attendee.
>
> I would think that the official list would be the one from the secretariat.
> If we are going to do all this work, then let's do it for the selection
> commitee too.
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
>  -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
> --
> Eligibility-discuss mailing list
> Eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss
>