IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Virtual BoF for draft-moonesamy-recall-rev

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Tue, 11 June 2019 15:29 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5FF1201C9 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 08:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=dZMfAcI3; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=QrlQ5Ml+
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jWGGSys26lha for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 08:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9042C120043 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 08:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([197.227.86.213]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x5BFTAcL004072 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 11 Jun 2019 08:29:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1560266964; x=1560353364; bh=7K3QEoQqtD4JY+h2q2BtJpftI3ctRYwzKV88dDN8cWk=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=dZMfAcI3BiVNgEyqRLEXw8mUkXKvL6r35jS3WgzwdLk5wR7ags8hECyG5UlG5SmVt KKce4TF0360pkDEnBP4GyJyEKPl/VI14jsLgin5EIbIY/vcEAMUL+r/Dx8eHc1cX7s a4zGs9yl86ytOa5ZBIbTLXaknx4/mqz6ygtUQVA8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1560266964; x=1560353364; i=@elandsys.com; bh=7K3QEoQqtD4JY+h2q2BtJpftI3ctRYwzKV88dDN8cWk=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=QrlQ5Ml+Mkn2+wDjfESi1cP4vBqrPurFg7ipA3gdotPXPaX2aR6lnDPLMlAOKsilx AO86/x5PqjdkNA34b1yiUANnyMXiaroBAun00Y899XsqtBxGKO2lD0hGQYzZ1jXYC6 rBAkxCCi0nx0/wbnfO/BBl4fkn+dXkxVLGLbr3I0=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20190611065212.0d37b868@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 08:28:57 -0700
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Cc: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBOX3PURx57jE1poyBt-VxdbVbcFp-E+eocPMH6fsBq6qw@mail.g mail.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20190525144314.0e72bb68@elandnews.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20190601204707.0bf89070@elandnews.com> <D58B591C-9140-4273-AA11-59E2EBD101FE@gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20190611033500.0c619e48@elandnews.com> <065101d52047$d35ea620$7a1bf260$@olddog.co.uk> <CABcZeBOX3PURx57jE1poyBt-VxdbVbcFp-E+eocPMH6fsBq6qw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/U5-Trlatv4Rj9xIZ6XTj8Lrv7Oo>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Virtual BoF for draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 15:29:33 -0000

Dear Mr Rescorla,
At 04:37 AM 11-06-2019, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>H/mm..  These don't seem like "issues" so much as restatements of 
>the solution SM's draft proposes.
>
>To take a specific one, what issue is addressed by reducing the 
>number of people required to sign the petition?

The above is a good question.  I'll propose the following changes to 
the second and third issues:

    - The required number of signatories sets a very high barrier to initiate
      a recall petition

    - The ineligibility of a member of appointing bodies from being a signatory
      restricts the initiation of a recall petition in a timely manner.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email