Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-eligibility-expand-05.txt

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Thu, 10 September 2020 02:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8273A0AEB for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 19:43:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XjQLzMQmU9zI for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 19:43:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22d.google.com (mail-lj1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 872613A0A9F for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 19:43:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id k25so6215078ljk.0 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 19:43:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=y2NiH5gxnQtuYJoFgzLtxhnHeWouxECq4162gZXbBnU=; b=paG9/t4HYZvMq1W+iojN5WVlKxhVa8SM6mM7hu37EhYdglmhzTpDaWxQMputdbge6U muM3zjUaCC5RJmAjk9WQ1i4Z10Oe3upM4xNcfAbaLuvPKLxaUOWDUcfFWuOUpjAh+YRT NTSiMwsy4xKRNkqhzgMP4gXQe9dzetOrGuDhWV1/SNSywTNZowr75ak/QWSsz1bgQhhL yNw/zUD3GU//iin/+4i/J/xPNTy/SUz4DOeUVp2fKmecraDWrAHlLn/TlCOxKftUvmOz 7vl+9KvL93bJ4KVw5vBmmzGaITZBcblb1POVz07ha8n3vUnrt5ozqJYdOawCSufXXUqv Yf/Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=y2NiH5gxnQtuYJoFgzLtxhnHeWouxECq4162gZXbBnU=; b=N4cz1AhAC68/dDWmyeaFTHin/rJwWgcGxPxrs/nZQGY3YVVWpnOgcKNXWluz88Avn2 i2vATIwvdvroDcoivlU0Rm/FcC1REDaPbOO1qZPFViEYTD6LwhTVHtipWnLhEiBOOb1j vSOo5MuWXdbEgKfWz8Qv1nIIjI59vNLc+9EyG9mo5tj+KPVe3moRbSd+oOKiDt6Eb+pV 1Z92rQv4/N7bzQTBdwcwTNhbQpSK6NJyy+CrWgxWdyvzqBNGTGl+cSvf/kGQ5DCBDIP5 z0DYpzrcRqnjPwZw6+BqvSrp+ZzdgCT3GahozcaMqeJXdjhUkUEmjIp5nE64r27WPDWr BM9Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Vqn1uaPRewAw/6p0od1RE/5NM2xswjIpvsS+Q0mQ3dTkvpvl9 0kvPnud2MazZZ63ebF4+ojXdXiZp9JXrZxu5353m6QQ+8AJFpQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzodQnZEo6w+ZEFH2OFcWYjuXqqWh3bcoTj+PCM7s3x86QXbqjUyHFyLYPrXHbjiwoP8f6Y4lQWp+GPRLKxkpg=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8114:: with SMTP id d20mr3134536ljg.409.1599705786637; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 19:43:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159962318959.19375.6649774205472330786@ietfa.amsl.com> <943d5d03-9605-35c7-2a3b-3cc9a48ff0e1@gmail.com> <e2afeee6-f5db-4cd1-8371-b163e01a6931@dogfood.fastmail.com> <29455.1599663931@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <29455.1599663931@localhost>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 19:42:30 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBMywwqPDSg9wgEGYOdG55d+E8dKYrELasV8meOiXBAFkA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>, eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000288f6605aeec8729"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/Uv6yHJuGX7-DcIKvnfe6VgsGJYU>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-eligibility-expand-05.txt
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 02:43:10 -0000

On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 8:06 AM Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
wrote:

>
> I have read the new document.  Thank you for the updates.
> I am happy with the direction we are going.
>
> Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com> wrote:
>     > 1) we should not include remote participants for IETF106 and earlier.
>     > They did not have an expectation of eligibility.  I hold this very
>     > weakly and would be easily persuaded to change my mind!
>
> I was going to post the same thing.
>
>     > 2) we should include remote participants for IETF110 (and any future
>     > IETFs if this document is renewed) regardless of whether there is a
>     > face-to-face component.
>
> I can live with this, but I believe that this is what the other paths are
> for.
> to be clear: I don't think that we should count remote attendees when there
> is a face-to-face meeting.
>

I agree with Michael. The reason we are making this adjustment is because
we are not having in-person meetings. If we have in-person meetings again,
we can of course decide to include remote people, but that's not a decision
we should take now.

-Ekr