IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Status update (was: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW comment period)

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 04 September 2019 21:19 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4D5120047 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 14:19:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=3qDGA3EC; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=1nQ+3h4C
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rCUSA8vKLlte for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 14:19:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CACC51200A3 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 14:19:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.115.148.199]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x84LJPBg023481 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 4 Sep 2019 14:19:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1567631978; x=1567718378; bh=74yDLSUmPYLOeBuhxFJuHVwh/A4DheQrGZgDooyLjWs=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=3qDGA3ECKm9HjaA60z8LHaJ8t2KIfMc3RoS1KRjrJsIG0V3Nmq6h/0kuVKqfpYNy6 aB5vvHXrAHuqqThS74cBbwv6PY4HkGqQlEzOpzgNx5gCiEsOSFk4uYmz6t8uQGfPFX OxHQL8ypVc07fuXGRB8356139Me/k+pVPP3F5GN8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1567631978; x=1567718378; i=@elandsys.com; bh=74yDLSUmPYLOeBuhxFJuHVwh/A4DheQrGZgDooyLjWs=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=1nQ+3h4CC24DJ2FoGKGktp8d5vQFpdbGhNExr68vf9mtpoO+8FEhzcsXVCYxa0MQt YFpo+pw5eWZufeD85zRr32NrSJx11+gi2yItTdZpzmjOojgBQ/yLJ/tPCALIexIoF8 UEHQU9GmVRs83L665vEyNr+Nx+rQADxRZT9NpXYk=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20190904140726.0c5d8a88@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 14:17:11 -0700
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_i+UUgVN923EuaUFNwDrrwkw-PZszv-napNSpieQ0dtRpw@mail.g mail.com>
References: <964a7d97-f146-4d2e-aa3e-d39fc08f6f76@Mikes-IPhone> <6.2.5.6.2.20190902034741.11a2fba8@elandnews.com> <CAHw9_i+UUgVN923EuaUFNwDrrwkw-PZszv-napNSpieQ0dtRpw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/V4PCFxJaCeoOlf128mZVcsNBQyk>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Status update (was: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW comment period)
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 21:19:41 -0000

Hi Warren,
At 01:00 PM 04-09-2019, Warren Kumari wrote:
>I'm embarrassed to admit that I'd managed to lose track of this and

It's okay.

>swap out most of the state - I'd somehow ended up with a flag set that
>you were going to do some more work on the BoF proposal (to clearly
>state the actual problems with the second and third issues) and
>scoping to make sure it doesn't stretch beyond recalls.

I proposed the following changes on the second and third issues: 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/U5-Trlatv4Rj9xIZ6XTj8Lrv7Oo

>I'm somewhat overloaded at the moment, but let me circle round with
>Alexey and Suresh and hope that they have  more state. I will also
>reread the threads to try swap in state.

Thanks,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email