IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Fwd: The "eligibility" list, and a virtual meeting

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Tue, 17 September 2019 20:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C5C1200CE for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:54:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TzEArBZEFMKz for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x230.google.com (mail-lj1-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6696C120072 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x230.google.com with SMTP id y23so4964161lje.9 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=skE+QFe3ZGWtEQUu/3eLB4pQk+5AmrPkbvcmnYNm5Pk=; b=FfDJ/aYGA8xunnXOKgc/wrIBX045K4Fzo8lhHsD+fRtytjPYuIsA8MWTU4DMpcT5cD 9kHOVCrq/+D//pyRHAqMsCRxs0bEudJ1mZPHRNnCKkVXNekWicZjxDWh+D7y0bDAwMUl OJ172/ccKStnLeK0omQHeDhGwJb8Drf2YvCDnxSq2vquDZi6E86gD0oW4KbWulHturUu LG8BKUCv07VsMmxrQJjqFlmpgtP4vEWSLzWXpd0MdC6ruWg+nsPidY/8HrBwp2l6wuy+ BHWec8PcKD3BzGuatkhBPM+WA7Y77K5ubX7rq9oplLEt9U72F1MlOyc7adLQoApob3AD Auzg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=skE+QFe3ZGWtEQUu/3eLB4pQk+5AmrPkbvcmnYNm5Pk=; b=T03FsrJ/3+KpKveo6B/TcaALOOaQwwBUexE6ScwHra/QjH4d4tHnPs1WR1syd5Xxj1 12EfbL8lQ3Dr7YthwIbz036ETTz9yBwJu3g859eU95R8NocSA7uY4LrxqfEonV0wj5ns to6aLBkXQoRX8fCu1hvAYsP7dWmpwtjx9TIeaUBi8sx4IJASyny8ooAcs6zJUyRmMQ8Y CRy6eZweQy03ljPnDAg24473iyoJtiTWVVrFDY4SopTPMU27m1R9FLdKplQD/xDmu0KV ELP/rK5jmmTzzG/i5WMEewVsjETRTjZFMyr4Ec+B3q2xmGySM54wqOQnjep0sDflofUI qYMw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXcH2jyqCqF0rzUT/6wAcX8m02DpZZPkxFmGCPdrArc5t3QxmD1 KAFSFcRL1ZaQq5I7wiGULuisOeIlWpoSWTX4d/zBrw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyVV/A2H7w6+fV4q2qPdLzLAtkfsoPfkNB53eTQ0tISyuyyabrQKWaBFKUuAZX0kU8+RLNGVpH/sb0W16+aHQQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9750:: with SMTP id f16mr156486ljj.239.1568753673666; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALaySJ+BEoDd5aas9VfAmfcF+H_54w4ETNafVwFAObhY_A2v-Q@mail.gmail.com> <C90E6D6D-D058-40A5-AA3B-2D2002077016@episteme.net> <CALaySJJggQqYhVHSdKCx4BvpiR31oodx9C9NkzfMoFGbUv+gmg@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJKxbwYXnE7gcgwmuBUWg_Q+QSx-yYtTCOLoQesB6JLojg@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJJh7zvuuuxcs-kE=LaaZP1aXiaT3HpQ30tt4DNOMMP0oQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMrnPv9AMhQgv4ciq2DypyB_rkqdwNkyuXgNqyHVGcpzQ@mail.gmail.com> <03d701d56d8d$5849b720$08dd2560$@olddog.co.uk> <CABcZeBMyzwXu+=w511aJcOPEu1CJ7PqSfyq3y6ya+j0DPQkSVg@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJ+nFvYtO73TNCaMAASdoh0zHgv7f6EVKZ4gLvYZJvh_DQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBNTyEgaQNCf2RgCy5R2BGM=sgX1Mn16XqZ5wA-9Xx399w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBNTyEgaQNCf2RgCy5R2BGM=sgX1Mn16XqZ5wA-9Xx399w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:53:56 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBMVGbJSYXcp+sXCVSu8TS=izA7XKnmsSqruKWeEkd3yWg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Cc: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000075a02d0592c5ed46"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/XDrUFeQiXF6YnCNQ7YPXdsItdZY>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Fwd: The "eligibility" list, and a virtual meeting
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 20:54:38 -0000

Oh, and UTC-7

On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 12:38 PM Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 12:34 PM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
> wrote:
>
>> > They may be facts, but that doesn't mean they are problems.
>>
>> Indeed, and this will work as IETF work always does:
>>
>> - Some people have raised the issues that I put in my message, and
>> they consider these to be problems that have to be addressed.
>>
>> - We will discuss them and decide whether we have rough consensus that
>> they *do* need to be addressed, and if so, whether we can come to
>> rough consensus on how.
>>
>> - If we do not have rough consensus to "fix" them, we won't.  If we
>> do, we will do our best to.
>>
>> Are there any issues with that process?
>>
>
> Nope. Thanks for the clarification.
>
> -Ekr
>
>>
>> Barry
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email