Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Handling the fear of "bogus" recall petitions

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Mon, 28 October 2019 15:59 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA7012010F for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 08:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SWsMLkU_veCG for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 08:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6533712009C for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 08:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.116.41.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id x9SFx0gs010052 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 28 Oct 2019 08:59:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1572278352; x=1572364752; i=@elandsys.com; bh=6gD8Q4xlVuyB2Qk+YTdRTjKMxGZHvntg5uhSNj+wtAQ=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=vozl4amUR/6N19/t0FxMrECvJjCGQjKiScR/iRWWDtu3nNP6S5XYwLl5w5hoI4WIr 2MJoB5hlo2hrTj7EvMBKjc2H3IKSMzJLBGRkckxBoWqio6jxQ6b69/lRQt8Ye1nl4I xBXokpIMCzmwuYi0Cg4aZSsmztrM3tUw2tkJ0LAA=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20191028080914.0c04a118@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 08:58:35 -0700
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Cc: adrian@olddog.co.uk
In-Reply-To: <28974.1572275232@localhost>
References: <00c801d58a9a$53693c60$fa3bb520$@olddog.co.uk> <CB806045-0E5E-4445-A377-7CD547B9DD90@cisco.com> <010a01d58ac1$c0ab2320$42016960$@olddog.co.uk> <dc3bf13f-0178-8e4c-6680-ae3258ac1a9b@gmail.com> <587B859DB99BCB30198AF5AE@PSB> <17311.1572013829@localhost> <01ef01d58b44$18700850$495018f0$@olddog.co.uk> <19846.1572202173@localhost> <6.2.5.6.2.20191027153050.13e594b0@elandnews.com> <28974.1572275232@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/YN7AeVTFkAx-qNV71ShHbe2t1Yc>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Handling the fear of "bogus" recall petitions
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 15:59:16 -0000

Hi Michael,
At 08:07 AM 28-10-2019, Michael Richardson wrote:
>1) You can participate on Meetecho without registered.
>    (I guess we agree that they don't count)

Please see https://www.ietf.org/how/meetings/104/remote/  Meetecho 
requires registration.

>2) You can register as a remote an never join a single Meetecho.

Yes.

>3) You can register as a remote user, but then not login to Meetecho, and
>    then you won't get counted as attendee.

I doubt that Meetecho would could it as the user did log into a session.

>I would think that the official list would be the one from the secretariat.

Yes.

>If we are going to do all this work, then let's do it for the selection
>commitee too.

Someone will have to submit a proposal if he/she would like to 
identify and address the wider issue(s).

Regards,
S. Moonesamy