IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-04: (with COMMENT)

Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Thu, 02 February 2023 18:02 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B88C151536; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 10:02:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wvtffwhYpF2g; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 10:02:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe36.google.com (mail-vs1-xe36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e36]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55F2CC1516E1; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 10:02:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe36.google.com with SMTP id m1so850566vst.7; Thu, 02 Feb 2023 10:02:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=+dIrHZPLJZ7uqInm224+IWpielWrCeONgHw8MJwMIfs=; b=fZ1jaMvtfyZiZxbLvBl92xE477U1IyoXzGiY+W/ccKVQLTmA/1oVR66QfXxNeuoJC5 UhgEZ9qkjPhjygcFwntAIWOp6F6/5j+0K9sMjdsLb1FOGf00Oky7vqa78jEPJ286eSko lQg79ZtBfNd1CEFDo82OR2FY8ADfhMoHM5MX7mYi1AKi6PAFeovQ6n84gVOUvBuv+1kW nkdlI1QCZ5xtUOChAZgiUpG8DvYCs7DU/DBB9N3zoOO8x+0uibJk2FhjWbBXBfzhtAy8 meoHwKgwFHqGVGERYzZRbzbsbNu0qh1Em8oZFUMpiDy0FLKjCGp8k3cRCxw5w8w1fmrY +Lxw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=+dIrHZPLJZ7uqInm224+IWpielWrCeONgHw8MJwMIfs=; b=GtjeXP4Mrac+qxrBp+AodSM6mdys3IlPf71Ya5UA9jGY6G2t8lySLCW/fNj5h0x3oQ lHVjsJA24TJwO3FtfNqR9RLEO23owKtWSFi6WgECNBE4PF6hLeD1yumeBJiu3KW0gfRh uGJNQ6YTqm8zu/ifxOdTeZde5s9YkxAfTkrbaqHP8gq2hys9Gvqr7LKXh8iz6wcBUvL5 xY35lLzOJ4vyR2O7Z6wYZ3tpihlwB3w2lrLl9DTvYMTMUc0EjtfFx17MyF1cTplD4DuF jBL08fd5j4o0DFlKChdowfOu2pXHXZucSV28EbqBx9Z2552bHeNtpnnXHGOzP4wXa0Rl FvZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWTyXupBjtakXKiCKYFi1WZWRpks0dA40hd+RaZgzYar0VrAMYH tnf0kD9KO5D8GDcSaVvDKbXf7/WzdSm0Yf3jS2wUYAIZPb4igg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/H051bX2L4NiZX8fymP1yS7yeJy+8osM664wdPV3yA0+PkgiYD85BbJrMpVbtr+T0VBF56n1Lutz84S+4VYek=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:e091:0:b0:3d4:aa7:e2d5 with SMTP id f17-20020a67e091000000b003d40aa7e2d5mr1536659vsl.32.1675360950923; Thu, 02 Feb 2023 10:02:30 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <167516329757.36247.16462784231304969127@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAM4esxRbaF8oUUsxG2DSgg6B2v-VGd7B8poNRrbR_qc4Y9v4aw@mail.gmail.com> <1888343.1675320560@dyas> <BY5PR11MB41960A5E77BB0BB54CE8BAC1B5D69@BY5PR11MB4196.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <8502E308-F25B-4077-8032-41E62C77536D@eggert.org> <CAM4esxRTEfOU94q0=JCVRdaTi4DLNAtFJM0-PhH0PbqqQeORHA@mail.gmail.com> <CAM4esxR2eaw8mjZGtMDLJku6MWf+JPWcYa-3wfDLa5viBTtmWQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM4esxR2eaw8mjZGtMDLJku6MWf+JPWcYa-3wfDLa5viBTtmWQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2023 10:02:18 -0800
Message-ID: <CAM4esxRptrTfFFxRdbLiiD3jEcBpi702jTFyRWLkFMpXMHiiLg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Cc: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis@ietf.org>, "elegy-chairs@ietf.org" <elegy-chairs@ietf.org>, "eligibility-discuss@ietf.org" <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>, "barryleiba@computer.org" <barryleiba@computer.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000059b84b05f3bb5e7f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/ZP0ShPSkvivrYcJdMl8w2e9EDIc>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF eligibility procedures <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2023 18:02:34 -0000

i'll try again
https://github.com/ietf-wg-elegy/rfc8989bis/pull/22

On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 8:28 AM Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> wrote:

> https://github.com/ietf-wg-elegy/rfc8989bis/pull/22
> <https://github.com/ietf-wg-elegy/pull/22>
>
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 8:03 AM Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Mixed into this PR
>>
>> https://github.com/ietf-wg-elegy/pull/22
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 2:51 AM Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Feb 2, 2023, at 12:02, Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton=
>>> 40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>> > I don't really care if it is someone else other than the IESG (e.g.,
>>> IAB, previous year's NomCom, ISOC board of trustees), although I suspect
>>> that the IESG is most appropriate, but IMO, being clear who is responsible
>>> is helpful.
>>>
>>> agree with this reasoning.
>>>
>>> (I earlier pushed back against the secretariat being tasked with this,
>>> which led to it becoming undefined.)
>>>
>>> Lars
>>>
>>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email