IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom eligibility & IETF 107 (fwd) Scott Mansfield: RE: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 31 March 2020 16:31 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856673A2443 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 09:31:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R4U7UT7M_Uw1 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 09:31:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf2e.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF1FB3A2429 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 09:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf2e.google.com with SMTP id bu9so5165575qvb.13 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 09:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=Suk/iOWsCnj3oXP8ftB6tr8kCKwpw1qz8GuFIUliTyI=; b=EvEGGVsLxsaKyoNC7FCslgwUH41K+M0yQa5M0hQ7B0W2wL1VmH5fqe9DkGCiVOvUv7 yajZTmt/KMMQ1qsUcyCmiD2gnQiPxLko04NQYz81U8ufnQaI/IvxqQElhX57jh/09/s4 512a+1LrpVvM5p6yt5o92mWOs0AmzJsDrTQ+5AtdEoUr2SL46MzQuCW0af1F6YqdINkU rKCr8De5pw8/AK8IulhBFTwCGJfaX168N7lPtLo/1hdYguWSB+WgZJx0HikzS16lSqDT V5+4tX0ymyETF9LNzYCDa6L4Yvb+eztak2zAY7NoRe1kCgdoOzRFs2vTtEPFuOMZ/LKE 97eA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=Suk/iOWsCnj3oXP8ftB6tr8kCKwpw1qz8GuFIUliTyI=; b=Ekn/RHn362xYvq9pzqqbOhYlnHz1SwjKZ1pmVnuXC9lXxiplt0rcivCRbdp8K+F+x+ pCVhNcWQBSPCKbEYgrEKWZIopofdaiQqMXVP6Tv/wgEQ8ijeEv1PKEnGE2BEN1+027Dn XgjqA3ldHnLkknvDEzkOKFtNenmcIvlNxPyn4o/NKn2kmpn4QgZaKDJol8nN0EbHdNkB htmruFPETDLBxef9y4KARgkROLj2jkDvl9K1DO+Jp+Aqg+UE3SiCgHQeEkvPlw/qdP6j WwvCUTiW/SdJmKUqd4h1UXWmmthDpU3l3/Z7y0hALTJml1ie/jy91d82AQunHxv89h7g obcw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ24Gm+5GNmtm3Zkv/cOVI0vykZe+YXVJ1F2LnmYc4WenGTfhhPZ 1XnJe30onTkMSn8nGWkzwUyGAld2caM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsq0Em+nNaXTvw+OypZfsWJiJv5wKLBLObKLmB2I9PRzfwyAEeq9hyNMbw6eukp4QoZN8A3TQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:1841:: with SMTP id d1mr10454746qvy.230.1585672257792; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 09:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.241] (c-24-91-177-160.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [24.91.177.160]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g201sm12903623qke.99.2020.03.31.09.30.56 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 31 Mar 2020 09:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <73ABAF20-EABA-4341-B992-981B72664529@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3A92F657-417B-4E17-B3E2-67E2341698CE"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3622.0.6\))
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 12:30:52 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAJc3aaOzHOsohZ60zLo5H3vR=M6LJv7MgcymyDZrX0xSSCX5aw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
To: Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com>
References: <28433.1585520758@localhost> <CAJc3aaNs2DipcSAdddB1PayPSFN+zRPDwyKog_LhjTu4B95afg@mail.gmail.com> <28427.1585618693@localhost> <CAJc3aaPkfAAhPLwPhKfikjhg=15AopFntGJefhLd7t9=a-fJkQ@mail.gmail.com> <0A2F31BE-4FC6-4CBF-9C29-7372A92242A8@fugue.com> <CAJc3aaOzHOsohZ60zLo5H3vR=M6LJv7MgcymyDZrX0xSSCX5aw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3622.0.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/Zrs0oR9PazuAJvhGfmQD9j-gD5g>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom eligibility & IETF 107 (fwd) Scott Mansfield: RE: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 16:31:09 -0000

On Mar 31, 2020, at 12:29 PM, Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com> wrote:
> That works too, but would in theory change something retroactively.  I am not opposed, but it may be open to post selection challenge (i.e. using rules we set after the fact).  

I don’t think it changes anything.  The last five in-person meetings were IETFs 102-107.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email