IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Eligibility-discuss] The "eligibility" list, and a virtual meeting

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 18 September 2019 07:08 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87214120125 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z4T05GwqEdJ4 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DB95120178 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3482; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1568790516; x=1570000116; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc: to:references; bh=IKIleVOh9aMUBA07yH+ztDDpIyoCtCLucenv0X/r+H4=; b=Mf1+mzs915gCfNHxljhvDqHqeJx6WPl0VrHPzSsSJ1ei8ms+p65cXHaZ FOu/ExLkKUqbSXBBQkksobt3BRVzy5rGMWsjIHkOHj+usR9/Oy6cSW4We kPXPSAjSpFGLScptLW9bnW2lJjNPiyE5x9juMJxdWO1oqS/hWcLQu5Vpy Q=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AJAADb1oFd/xbLJq1mGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBVQIBAQEBAQsBgRWCQiASKo0eiCKHRItShguBewIHAQEBCQMBAS8BAYQ/AoMgNgcOAgMBAwIDAQEEAQEBAgEFBG2FOYVKAQEBAQIBeQULCwQBCQouVwYTFIMOAYF7D7FAhUyEZxCBNAGBUIo/gX+BOB+CTD6IAYImBJV3ln2CLIIugRORQRuNfIsgpAGDEQIEBgUCFYFZDCWBWDMaCBsVOyoBgkE+EhAUkBU+AzCQdgEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,519,1559520000"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="16886434"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 18 Sep 2019 07:08:34 +0000
Received: from [10.61.223.208] ([10.61.223.208]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x8I78XAc016555 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 18 Sep 2019 07:08:33 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <12C94CE5-899D-4D0C-9C03-5F39DBC9D2F3@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2FE09687-BA88-4BC8-ABD6-D05D028989BB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 09:08:32 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBNP3F-9er-Uv01bkmuLpwYq2ju3nUH0dH3gqFMFuz_Gpw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
References: <CALaySJ+BEoDd5aas9VfAmfcF+H_54w4ETNafVwFAObhY_A2v-Q@mail.gmail.com> <C90E6D6D-D058-40A5-AA3B-2D2002077016@episteme.net> <CALaySJJggQqYhVHSdKCx4BvpiR31oodx9C9NkzfMoFGbUv+gmg@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJKxbwYXnE7gcgwmuBUWg_Q+QSx-yYtTCOLoQesB6JLojg@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJJh7zvuuuxcs-kE=LaaZP1aXiaT3HpQ30tt4DNOMMP0oQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMrnPv9AMhQgv4ciq2DypyB_rkqdwNkyuXgNqyHVGcpzQ@mail.gmail.com> <03d701d56d8d$5849b720$08dd2560$@olddog.co.uk> <CABcZeBMyzwXu+=w511aJcOPEu1CJ7PqSfyq3y6ya+j0DPQkSVg@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20190917153221.0780aa08@elandnews.com> <CABcZeBNP3F-9er-Uv01bkmuLpwYq2ju3nUH0dH3gqFMFuz_Gpw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.223.208, [10.61.223.208]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/aUeqLeYfexi4bk9LOxsjlc-knc8>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] The "eligibility" list, and a virtual meeting
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 07:08:39 -0000

Eric,

> On 18 Sep 2019, at 02:03, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
> 
> I mostly agree it's a fact [0]. I'm unpersuaded that it's a problem that needs solving. There are a number of facts that some members of the community might prefer were otherwise (for instance, some might not like our IPR policy); that does not make them problems that the IETF needs to address.


Is there a reasonable argument to be made that someone who participates in person is more impacted by poor leadership than one who participates remotely?

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email