[Eligibility-discuss] on re-using nomcom chairs (was Re: Draft meeting minutes)

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Wed, 30 October 2019 11:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1DC6120133 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 04:45:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yitter.info header.b=WuUN9RdI; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yitter.info header.b=CceHSL01
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kkoy5Us8OWoB for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 04:45:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.yitter.info (mx4.yitter.info [159.203.56.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E56D1120110 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 04:45:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0802BE524 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 11:44:54 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yitter.info; s=default; t=1572435894; bh=Ur+RfDw87+RAwMyegK2YyfFVcJSHoWDqqsylcNo3bqA=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=WuUN9RdIre7VV+DJ6GdGWrJFV/KrUbi24rhWv2bKYwBM/QkIToV0Mf0xoGk5vQqap DFUTFencX1zqXAEDvhU4UoA+iDtXeg2iFRceU/sRqLV+EhdqNX01UxxU5EZzz9iojt 9hszzTJq6xBFjRIEiacRkwFUcioA9HZ8mfS+SMcw=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crankycanuck.ca
Received: from mx4.yitter.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx4.yitter.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IxzzyWiLkGV5 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 11:44:53 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 07:44:52 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yitter.info; s=default; t=1572435893; bh=Ur+RfDw87+RAwMyegK2YyfFVcJSHoWDqqsylcNo3bqA=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=CceHSL01cb4WNX/Huv8a02dx+W2bAEkf7eY5AZkMQGID5sEsPgqDvCv9xo2hou/Ja NkAwtQdVTJeld+oCW/ip8O8S3pws8aegh7gup1Lzgbh5z3mbYX2dhFu6XCXHoAjhar pskfSoa4yTILqvzQDQcXLeIuSBJNtgFkvH8Wsn9Y=
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20191030114452.ngy5jlp75gptqrjp@mx4.yitter.info>
References: <99234A93-2224-47F1-AA65-C71DC5DA3CD3@episteme.net> <f20ef671-1e13-5dc7-4e7e-06eb40d77796@gmail.com> <ad44164b-db3a-88c2-6222-c9954e8bd4b9@nthpermutation.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <ad44164b-db3a-88c2-6222-c9954e8bd4b9@nthpermutation.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/aXkV3-WvQlJakqJmi9NeZ0yHo68>
Subject: [Eligibility-discuss] on re-using nomcom chairs (was Re: Draft meeting minutes)
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 11:45:29 -0000

Hi,

Speaking with my ISOC President hat on:

On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 04:16:29PM -0400, Michael StJohns wrote:
 
> How about the last three Nomcom chairs that didn't serve on a Nomcom
> committee or with the petition target on one of the I* bodies or as a
> co-worker?   2/3 vote to void the petition?

I would like to remind people that I already have quite a difficult
job finding a well-qualified, non-disqualified, willing and able
nomcom chair.  And I start with the advantage of knowing some part of
the community (knowledge that inevitably will grow stale over time, of
course); not everyone who will ever be appointed to my job will start
with such an advantage.  If people take a decision that starts to add
more possible time commitments to nomcom chairs, finding good chairs
will get harder.  If serving as nomcom chair signs you up to a
possible responsibility for an undefined number of years (as the above
formula would, because of the interactions with who you didn't appoint
and work with and and so on), you might be reluctant to take on such a
job.  It's already a two year commitment.

Best regards,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com