Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Report on the RFC 8989 experiment

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 01 September 2021 23:04 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817883A1D07; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 16:04:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id spqGP9QdI1Nn; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 16:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE9693A1D03; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 16:04:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B977392A5; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 19:10:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id q8XxYVQy5cb7; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 19:10:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5876A392A3; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 19:10:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6D28510; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 19:04:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org>, eligibility-discuss@ietf.org, ietf-nomcom@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <359F2025-772B-4B15-8EAA-B8E1BE705392@ietf.org>
References: <C5D2F5EC-6483-441C-90BC-1900E305D226@ietf.org> <359F2025-772B-4B15-8EAA-B8E1BE705392@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 19:04:27 -0400
Message-ID: <30062.1630537467@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/c_UF6Uu1rp8COS5Hv5A-5hPANcI>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Report on the RFC 8989 experiment
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF eligibility procedures <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 23:04:45 -0000

You write:
  > Enable a person registering for IETF 114 (July 2022) to volunteer for
  > NomCom at the time of registration. The ability to volunteer for NomCom
  > during registration was present for several years prior to 2021, but was
  > absent from the IETF 111 registration form. This may have been a factor
  > in the decrease of volunteers. NomCom 2020-21 received 61 volunteers
  > based on the IETF 108 registration form.

But, surely July 2022 is too late.
You must mean IETF113 (March 2022).

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide