Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: Notification for draft-eastlake-rfc3797bis-00.txt
Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Tue, 23 May 2023 14:30 UTC
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB80C151079 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 May 2023 07:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.078
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.078 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EZcxbWkQEESO for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 May 2023 07:30:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E068FC151073 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 May 2023 07:30:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.102] ([47.186.48.51]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPSA id 34NEUnGV047628 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 May 2023 09:30:49 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1684852249; bh=IqDB4KAYCP1+qecrg5csGSiq7VeXOg70yizDHINH9ws=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=gDWupt5YSeWH3rrnPT0zEIn+IwVIG89OtO3D+uOg30IcIRdw9oJZ148zp0lcOEWWr yqpFTVplg/XS1f7ryJAfMkkyhcuMp1RRC5U7h7Z5dMiddEHt/XmvNsTxWfZxy+nMUM meFlSsFyZwvbE52OhINKgi9/5rKBys9qehagi5Lc=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.48.51] claimed to be [192.168.1.102]
Message-ID: <4bd46dd8-bc23-fd22-ce55-274bc4f9095e@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 09:30:44 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
References: <54F373CD-1E97-42BC-9AAB-0451ABD9D448@eggert.org> <52d600e9-c5fd-a086-9690-d4ac4a6d6de2@nostrum.com> <e1715390-46c8-528f-ad12-254313e2267c@gmail.com> <18664.1684799255@localhost> <7d91e9ac-67a1-c3b1-6523-54e7b0fc151d@gmail.com> <CALaySJJOZOpBxmSrxSq8ki8dfHG1egdqm9c=WnmcGUCU0iuWHQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJJOZOpBxmSrxSq8ki8dfHG1egdqm9c=WnmcGUCU0iuWHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/dJBAt9e1eaPBbkVJmxvE3hNat9o>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: Notification for draft-eastlake-rfc3797bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF eligibility procedures <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 14:30:55 -0000
I _do_ see a reason to use a separate group. If, in the lifetime of the effort that is working to change the selection process, we end up with another reason to change the eligibility criteria, and have to do so on a deadline, having the two groups with two different charters will help keep the different efforts on track. Throwing it into one bucket will encourage scope creep across the efforts (and make it harder for people who are coming to the conversation freshly understand what the purpose of the bucket even is). RjS On 5/22/23 7:17 PM, Barry Leiba wrote: > Personally: > I don't see any reason not to keep the "elegy" working group with a > new charter that's designed for the new work. I don't really care if > the WG nickname no longer directly refers to the work, and I'm happy > to continue chairing. > > Barry > > On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 8:12 PM Brian E Carpenter > <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 23-May-23 11:47, Michael Richardson wrote: >>> Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > I concur with Robert, so I think the next stop is gendispatch. >>> >>> Okay, but is one of the gendispatch option to recharter ELEGY? >>> Or is that already excluded from the list of options in your opinion? >>> >>> (Asking for information) >> I actually don't care. If gendispatch decides that a full WG process is >> need, it would a be a fairly profound recharter. The charter says >> "No other aspect of NomCom selection or operation is in scope", and I >> can't quite make up a suitable acronym, but I'm sure we can find one >> if we have to. >> >> Brian >> >> >> -- >> Eligibility-discuss mailing list >> Eligibility-discuss@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Lars Eggert
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Robert Sparks
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Barry Leiba
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Donald Eastlake
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Robert Sparks
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Lars Eggert
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Joel Halpern
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Joel Halpern
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Paul Hoffman
- [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Martin Thomson
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Donald Eastlake
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Donald Eastlake
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Martin Thomson
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Salz, Rich
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Martin Thomson
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Salz, Rich
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Rob Sayre
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Salz, Rich
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Martin Thomson
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Rob Sayre
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Salz, Rich
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Christian Huitema
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Donald Eastlake
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Rob Sayre
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Salz, Rich
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Michael StJohns
- [Eligibility-discuss] list address (was: Re: On 3… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Michael Richardson
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Salz, Rich
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] list address (was: Re: … Rob Sayre
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Michael StJohns
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Martin Thomson
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Salz, Rich
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Michael Richardson
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Donald Eastlake
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Martin Thomson