[Eligibility-discuss] Virtual BoF for draft-moonesamy-recall-rev

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Sat, 25 May 2019 21:49 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7997120115 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 May 2019 14:49:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=FBiA2TfU; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=sIiqePoI
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8KrCQQ3Y4NPT for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 May 2019 14:49:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 386F212002F for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 May 2019 14:49:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([197.226.49.188]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x4PLmitg021126 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 25 May 2019 14:48:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1558820938; x=1558907338; bh=78sTBu77a0KWBuvpn+UaeJMXprxp61o6LDgmufODPvc=; h=Date:To:From:Subject; b=FBiA2TfUdXeoGwPzTnCCvz8v6Z4eKN8RfdAAPGjBETL2lrmrm2hGadmg7OhcNZUBq jvjoMH3adhjLZHgUwfdLkfjAQYnH1fLGHa4O0kczwRy0djCHHCAA1EtbbscHmam5Wt cvOdUfMuqQLvTOptQnB3aFPMUuAiEKh1cpwtd86k=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1558820938; x=1558907338; i=@elandsys.com; bh=78sTBu77a0KWBuvpn+UaeJMXprxp61o6LDgmufODPvc=; h=Date:To:From:Subject; b=sIiqePoIIxkDkZjh/oKva0oVe2zgMHoF6yR6r89SyRg2G0tc4aE9euuinCDoWnyIK nT+Hz9ZULHe5EyBSREqzyRkhNmOBHB+vlNPciEQoWNYHyzDFX+gnqYbxw/fuJVwG8X FdLkaetKlQOzwIIAeKgTrnV531f3ISsuf0PpEBQk=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20190525144314.0e72bb68@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sat, 25 May 2019 14:48:28 -0700
To: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/ftKFY8H0epI1zUxMeHr_B_Vll7c>
Subject: [Eligibility-discuss] Virtual BoF for draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 May 2019 21:49:10 -0000

Dear Area Directors,

I would like to propose a virtual BOF to discuss about 
draft-moonesamy-recall-rev.  The issues to be discussed are:

   Problem statement

   The current description of the process for handling recalls of
   NomCom-appointed roles is described in RFC 7437 and is being updated in
   draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7437bis.  This work seeks to address only two specific
   issues with the process and is not intended to re-open a discussion of other
   aspects of recall procedures. The two issues are:

      - Ineligibility of IAB and IESG Members and other Nomcom Appointees
        to sign a recall petition

      - Ineligibility of remote participants to seek redress through the
        recall process

Regards,
S. Moonesamy