Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Fwd: The "eligibility" list, and a virtual meeting

[Eric Rescorla <[e-mail]>]

On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 9:34 AM Barry Leiba <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi, all.
>
> I am serving as the responsible AD for a virtual meeting (via WebEx)
> and ongoing work to address what's been discussed on this list (the
> "eligibility" list).  See below for the problem statement that will
> drive the virtual meeting, and let's see where we get from there.
>

I assume we'll start by discussing whether these claimed problems in fact
need to be addressed?



> The rules for virtual meetings require that we give two weeks' notice
> of the meeting time, but I'd like to do closer to four weeks, so we
> need to nail down a date very soon.  It's going to be challenging to
> find a time of day that works for enough of us, and I'll have to ask
> people to be very flexible about times, realizing that *someone* is
> likely to have to participate at a pretty awful hour, local time.
>
> I'd like to get feedback on this plan in the next few days, and then
> put out a doodle around the end of the week to try to pick a day and
> time.  If you intend to participate, please post to this thread your
> intent and your time zone (as "UTC-4", "UTC+1", and so on, relative to
> UTC).
>
> I think we do need to decide, as a group, whether the limited update
> to the recall process is important enough to stand on its own... or
> whether it makes more sense to address the broader issue of
> enfranchising remote participants, and to update the recall process as
> part of that.


Or whether any change is needed at all, right?

-Ekr