Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Draft meeting minutes

Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com> Tue, 29 October 2019 20:16 UTC

Return-Path: <msj@nthpermutation.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB4F712012C for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 13:16:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nthpermutation-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n5tWipi-jPtS for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 13:16:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82d.google.com (mail-qt1-x82d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47DF812007A for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 13:16:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82d.google.com with SMTP id x21so4982296qto.12 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 13:16:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nthpermutation-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=IM2gu5EVxIxU6r5KKdjhUd0FhVJck33iJSZ7RXc4WPI=; b=K3z75wJo6PYRM2bFW+Pz8ze+WLxkbOatTU/yjmxL/vmYzIpN+GLFvd8lObmq4rxAKK w8H6cro1sDOnzoVkXa+xw0vUTMrBJ5qQhjq5LQSaC+U47mAg/ZaAW+t29O9OHbbNTx1C M7uXW74dG18B+aNdnNgH5pMuLEx23Wq0NTxjOV+MIDF6TwxhgrrfLJR9+lmOCtMUXSOI 0JOkMk7GqN9Y1XEd4IYEx0BjO9cjLS5ZXR+SrjWDd4ApZkOBFfCUx0E2jDQE9NR+bDdj Jd82TzuDWvK3xqSrTyG2HkWGlnhnBasm+Jl0rj9PyVM1tIe8eha7YS7uudjH7mIm1PDe 6KAg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=IM2gu5EVxIxU6r5KKdjhUd0FhVJck33iJSZ7RXc4WPI=; b=pt1ik5Oca/SISlyWbgzdn4BkjqiJ9UYvlvGQHH6Gse8T+jZYowhWW68wFuRnyax3IX A62F2CTOL69W7QdXSaiKLSsoCT3EoeQgiPZQRgBgiC8jfinrx149B31YTjem2RecfWYw Ht+aGZNVgXuid7PVWZcuuVATum6e04Zoez/RvrgwrHCSFOpQ/tbuEtyxWPJGIBn3LDZw RAqj71Q3HZ7kFBcaBB+V2DUL8GI2I7HdMUiht4nwqgWjiOb/iH47vKOcMkrM+L96hWPV +SlhkEFehmoOv2xvFJb4hqAXWwxrS37uhWjbwa8MowDvqBcVX5ZhsLtDusGQU9PhZfg4 VVZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX5SCP7lUY+ZMBx6Qmt8lL+1QBCdngJWcKJcnRJV4OBD6jqCFgN eXUAslhYum2vnD9NxvMb87v9fTAQ0aU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyNJJsZS2b+zq47GXk2XVbKQj0w1EtmhpefsOya+5iYdnDYsHemYt5XI0ui8/anZ3PZK5US3Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:c78b:: with SMTP id k11mr25371538qvj.47.1572380191863; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 13:16:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:152:4400:437c:8542:998c:670d:7fca? ([2601:152:4400:437c:8542:998c:670d:7fca]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o13sm12135000qto.96.2019.10.29.13.16.31 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 13:16:31 -0700 (PDT)
To: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
References: <99234A93-2224-47F1-AA65-C71DC5DA3CD3@episteme.net> <f20ef671-1e13-5dc7-4e7e-06eb40d77796@gmail.com>
From: Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com>
Message-ID: <ad44164b-db3a-88c2-6222-c9954e8bd4b9@nthpermutation.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:16:29 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f20ef671-1e13-5dc7-4e7e-06eb40d77796@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/jyTu8E-eEatDAlB93mTohBIbqIA>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Draft meeting minutes
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 20:16:35 -0000

On 10/29/2019 3:27 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> I've been thinking for some days that perhaps a committee of two, say the
> ISOC President and the current NomCom Chair, would be able to declare
> that a received recall petition is frivolous and simply dismiss it. As long
> as this was a public process, I think it would be reasonable.

I like the idea of a fast-fail, but both of these people are 
problematic.  The Nomcom chair because they were probably on the Nomcom 
that selected the target of the petition, and the ISOC president 
because, under current rules, they would select the Recall committee chair.

How about the last three Nomcom chairs that didn't serve on a Nomcom 
committee or with the petition target on one of the I* bodies or as a 
co-worker?   2/3 vote to void the petition?

The current recall process really needs overhauling.  I once calculated 
it could take 60-90 days from first announcement of the pending petition 
to get to the point where a recall committee could make a decision, and 
a good part of that time is doing all the things we currently do to 
verify and select Nomcom volunteers and somewhat to select the chair.

How about 1) Use the last nomcom volunteer list and seed and select the 
next 10 or so people (pick enough so that some can say no), 2) Have the 
chair be a former Nomcom chair  who gets selected randomly as stand-by 
Recall chair from the pool of past 10-15 chairs (minus the last 3 
chairs)?  All mechanical and *fast* - give people a week to say yes or 
no to be on the committee and you're ready to go.

Later, Mike