Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom eligibility & IETF 107 (fwd) Scott Mansfield: RE: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 31 March 2020 21:42 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A9073A0C26 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 14:42:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id helf9y1F9-jy for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 14:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x633.google.com (mail-pl1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::633]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31E9F3A09AB for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 14:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x633.google.com with SMTP id h11so8678816plr.11 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 14:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hWCLD+dLUX8vT+ichSOfOM4D7gS1XTlW3djoYlRZ9aA=; b=O2rYJz2Cau3ziENWulQg8Mu2xQe+ZNrxa/y3LwzNQUVTZ6Ep7VD35cS8F1J679i1Fc KS25J2zKA0315/dWHA2pILkHcy7vlS/qrz9ZXnqpdHqwanlf5YdgQZhosFKxNAlNGo/1 mtRMSeNsw/W5fVqwgD4OMPxT+m26rlzm4FN0+O7UQ6oMa5UtJ07/AVBFXIBgAxxlzDBa ROETvGGetEGypXazJPnItYHcyXoQzJWrRlL3DpB7xbRrXNyQvUwLDo+Oi6Pv+OhRE87J bmL25nO/XDagvV+LznC49ir838VWnpys6xigHieX7QMmfSD5OI1BDQFDeSwhkDcyvoZM +APw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hWCLD+dLUX8vT+ichSOfOM4D7gS1XTlW3djoYlRZ9aA=; b=NfZyqcjAN4OC0Ms3eVTX8T6eY3085WAzS4iEuFXu2Gpvdhh98SeHA3Ul8uvk4LqyPN NzAQ70EmzW9jG+Q8FpYpHRC4EbiAtT2F34ylwh2WQU6n3elQbRKoqCc/rBJkpgyJovgf kLvfccFAfFAIGq+Oen470TG8di7bHaspdTPzwYZ/qdwK5SOBesWRpkgjK4A7g/lkiF4g 1wOCojMDlyglKOFZnn+DUXfw/9/wxuZIkmfcgbMINgxH93fPs9Az6le3joBGSIt3LUpz IMNGc6xruI6NkjXi1+0PJugh2WAfk086as3Kl6QRFsp0mMOBx3kfY4FQ2v0Iu8cpOteW fLew==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuauOzJbKdebR/HMq7VBUOxlTwyqfrbQTpdg8wMp/iYZ3kJoTFNJ 8EeJX2xY/BuEn3WO/wkcXwUw3DGn
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypInhT5qojPJ9k9FR85twcrhaAD47qSxPT1drLcQfcwYGG8CmbxVaTYoS3lr9dQ3sY5VJEj0aw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3103:: with SMTP id gc3mr1059431pjb.58.1585690957164; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 14:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] ([165.84.25.143]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t186sm12222307pgd.43.2020.03.31.14.42.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 31 Mar 2020 14:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: "eligibility-discuss@ietf.org" <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
References: <CAJc3aaNhe5pwvNrfJ26UKpKB2NDVScSNvuWyfP5Cg7vkM__tMg@mail.gmail.com> <DF014A4B-24FF-454B-939A-467164DBED48@fugue.com> <6FFAC31C-40D7-472B-B385-6AE4B1E34030@akamai.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <d16eb1d3-fff7-598f-31d2-0421fd45d763@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 10:42:31 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6FFAC31C-40D7-472B-B385-6AE4B1E34030@akamai.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/mz1tWsWojdlluVmeSm_Iu8VIV2c>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom eligibility & IETF 107 (fwd) Scott Mansfield: RE: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 21:43:04 -0000

Why is thread even on eligibility-discuss rather than ietf@ ?

Regards
   Brian

On 01-Apr-20 06:32, Salz, Rich wrote:
> *>* We simply have no way to account for IETF 107 attendance.
> 
>  
> 
> Exactly.  Looked at one way, it didn’t happen (IESG statement).  Looked at another way, it did happen (IESG/IAB seated).
> 
> As I said, it’s a Heisenmeeting.
> 
>