IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Fwd: The "eligibility" list, and a virtual meeting

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Tue, 17 September 2019 19:39 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B942D120112 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:39:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 527PP-sMULFa for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:39:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com (mail-lj1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7ED5120046 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id f5so4780092ljg.8 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0602HUz+Jm9fxoo7g3dGKQ4UDXskq9qLVxXVzf2sfhM=; b=AOw7T8rvFY83Pxe8PegPgyx6R0i3NR4bF+cH0yBfcy91nFpOpV25iZhVyRQ4ZovHtT RFY3aWy2vcM+v+zZ4F3RGCza051wBL1iKAUh6XOXHoQlNWBxaB1JS8rDCwx/CVBEabA9 S6/1Uwy9sWYpG13j6rEO1Mi2bfzuEI5695PvxUBVVl12h+PBzKF573IoEMG//lozRwdw 0Dv2dpsWOHOEYp2QIqi3k3f/+UdtF1jKz9s0Rrvc7IZrbytNWgTYf00RBGf1EmjR0YQI 43gv+3V/xBl32DJpRjbRu4G5e6GhIyRNhSSG9enektBHohB/jEWGT98xNFf1FLzWkxbp c4nQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0602HUz+Jm9fxoo7g3dGKQ4UDXskq9qLVxXVzf2sfhM=; b=BZF/gcO9wT6JvvgQU3aaJP5syQWUZM6nR3pcXWssLHNQ5vL84MmGpJQL3ec8YQ+RyB NcDtSbPaYF+gpWnltduTeGN+H526XXUGkGSG+Liyj0pfxKlGNBtniru7RAglgeJdtoKO 0gkdixbybDSUUUsXpTg4JPVmF1kbRP6jOyAgC+B29718VacTp2DW9MFSAfVEJw517pYj gqafv/9q8vrQ0YIpL/2MrpH5sh3iZOJM725Q4EeDvV3YB9x/NAYc2W+8sfbCQ78XVWLq AJ5HjZbWaDHxw/ezblKDaO12G3OPzkG7Ycvpal+QAQO8X2zYdP7f7vph0hi1WLAwjaar 87qg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXZqxrIRVJ9IDIOlY9gz9BoKnuGK1FoNbQy10ZF48UmJ63QYfG2 PZ0ze3VbzUEOr7ftAo5Qrvg2pYMLr1E+40ZNDoHDPg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxarFVSulXzLChJMFkQa86SyZw+sax7Ys98tk29CYbFI34ricXBeM8iy4egUqksD/XrRjIFB2QisXUMsNrptRs=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a313:: with SMTP id l19mr1210lje.205.1568749149937; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:39:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALaySJ+BEoDd5aas9VfAmfcF+H_54w4ETNafVwFAObhY_A2v-Q@mail.gmail.com> <C90E6D6D-D058-40A5-AA3B-2D2002077016@episteme.net> <CALaySJJggQqYhVHSdKCx4BvpiR31oodx9C9NkzfMoFGbUv+gmg@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJKxbwYXnE7gcgwmuBUWg_Q+QSx-yYtTCOLoQesB6JLojg@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJJh7zvuuuxcs-kE=LaaZP1aXiaT3HpQ30tt4DNOMMP0oQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMrnPv9AMhQgv4ciq2DypyB_rkqdwNkyuXgNqyHVGcpzQ@mail.gmail.com> <03d701d56d8d$5849b720$08dd2560$@olddog.co.uk> <CABcZeBMyzwXu+=w511aJcOPEu1CJ7PqSfyq3y6ya+j0DPQkSVg@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJ+nFvYtO73TNCaMAASdoh0zHgv7f6EVKZ4gLvYZJvh_DQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJ+nFvYtO73TNCaMAASdoh0zHgv7f6EVKZ4gLvYZJvh_DQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:38:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBNTyEgaQNCf2RgCy5R2BGM=sgX1Mn16XqZ5wA-9Xx399w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Cc: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d30f970592c4df95"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/o1vEsYXjru6mIEidGdMN1nDomT0>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Fwd: The "eligibility" list, and a virtual meeting
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 19:39:14 -0000

On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 12:34 PM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
wrote:

> > They may be facts, but that doesn't mean they are problems.
>
> Indeed, and this will work as IETF work always does:
>
> - Some people have raised the issues that I put in my message, and
> they consider these to be problems that have to be addressed.
>
> - We will discuss them and decide whether we have rough consensus that
> they *do* need to be addressed, and if so, whether we can come to
> rough consensus on how.
>
> - If we do not have rough consensus to "fix" them, we won't.  If we
> do, we will do our best to.
>
> Are there any issues with that process?
>

Nope. Thanks for the clarification.

-Ekr

>
> Barry
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email