IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-eligibility-expand-05.txt

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 17 September 2020 20:43 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C873A0B79 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 13:43:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZWwNHEXF_bWQ for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 13:43:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x532.google.com (mail-pg1-x532.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::532]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CB313A0B78 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 13:43:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x532.google.com with SMTP id d13so2053049pgl.6 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 13:43:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XifoIMwCUYBJyltW6ya8mMdgN8aGJprgql0xx5p4soE=; b=dYKeoKkiXLeUhIfB/59OtIqD32flop3kY2YIfZB0HO+Ib27lDvmlFsMeUAafxSrb5S 0l98cBXD/3lauuiYk19TbTisdlpkoU6AIDy4jzV43sEZIFafUQL93Ybxs3o1YyblpaEw aP0/KAygp1wuede1mS9+7yc+CPkP7ubDHu4qrctEG1YXYcwDIZD3M5B/nqjpNTqY6Xer h27G4BBtAbO4IzWErfAOlgplrcAVmfdyMsf7hZVco1GAY38Zy57Yr5EpJClnzFWMSW71 ZxkzEskmNAwIhiWPWqDpFSgmwCg6SK5QA/Jvq06Q+zfMWkeTfZwYxH3rm4S063y9kbgM CkiQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XifoIMwCUYBJyltW6ya8mMdgN8aGJprgql0xx5p4soE=; b=G1XF7XYLiLZVM5yq7n4IISgg6fpAOUEnsEEKxJTxicYHYn4AkENh9/gTJ1NiguJh1s D4zy5MFrf1AOjvu21+kmDm6lLpe38a5JstU5EmC/Og5+B4Jv5HRUZ50PUFiR+XLQ7w9C yaGRPNPvLf/5TPVCAny+ClSYqwlJfAEnjzFaJHzSY0fOGfYrlqJJEhjnbhjgEUn7yPsa bxWkLaM0Gw2ye983NkyP99VxXmtaPsbX/B2N5azpC0/+lYCZCchn7rvzppdEyWk0Z8Eu aokLM02QNZ4d+J/kn047/vv6tyVooTfOHa1ieCipNpEZv2952+mDptqVMhZ2EDZyF1IQ 5xzw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532h3DJ4Vu4fmeMF/DYEf7X3WiQpHO3qLYgtQ2HohT/QPRq9Nkt/ sUceHDYK0WPIknzMSPOvokWney69Ee0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxzc8BBWLFjJ4v1eunwBu/4lifgxDND8I7DQk6pP66L2Ks0avg3VHf2Ln7awboZlghrSnJF6g==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:fe49:: with SMTP id x9mr23802600pgj.446.1600375430263; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 13:43:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([151.210.138.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e16sm487491pgv.81.2020.09.17.13.43.48 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 17 Sep 2020 13:43:49 -0700 (PDT)
To: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
References: <159962318959.19375.6649774205472330786@ietfa.amsl.com> <943d5d03-9605-35c7-2a3b-3cc9a48ff0e1@gmail.com> <e2afeee6-f5db-4cd1-8371-b163e01a6931@dogfood.fastmail.com> <29455.1599663931@localhost> <CABcZeBMywwqPDSg9wgEGYOdG55d+E8dKYrELasV8meOiXBAFkA@mail.gmail.com> <07ad01d6875a$e70c07a0$b52416e0$@olddog.co.uk> <a149053f-dcde-4c7c-87d8-ebe86102ef44@www.fastmail.com> <07cf01d68765$44d1dfe0$ce759fa0$@olddog.co.uk> <5bffbc36-9368-4498-80f4-88ecd3ea6697@dogfood.fastmail.com> <07e901d68768$c2a7be50$47f73af0$@olddog.co.uk> <023a3e3a-61fe-4c4f-ac02-ce7759a9fbc8@dogfood.fastmail.com> <b7b7bb03-f5ee-d2ea-d5f4-dc764ec6f905@gmail.com> <55e4ddd9-72da-46d5-8898-8410c14e6954@dogfood.fastmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <7ce6caa9-2ea7-5997-60a4-094b2a358326@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 08:43:45 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <55e4ddd9-72da-46d5-8898-8410c14e6954@dogfood.fastmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/rEWy9HkkZupxYG_xsEKThXeX3C8>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-eligibility-expand-05.txt
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 20:43:52 -0000

On 18-Sep-20 00:28, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2020, at 07:17, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> So (author hat on) I'm reading this as a suggested change: "Remote attendance will be included for IETF110 regardless of whether there is an in-person meeting, as we don't expect that everyone will be able to travel."
> 
> It turns out that sometimes procrastination can make problems go away :p  It appears so likely that IETF110 will be remote that this whole discussion in moot anyway.

Yes. I'd still like to make the text future-proof in case we decided to run the same
experiment for a second year. In any case, perhaps we can hold off on a revised
I-D until the IETF110 decision is confirmed.

  Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email