Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Suggestions for nomcom chair selection?

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 09 September 2020 22:38 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A78A3A0F82 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 15:38:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZtOoP54Pz8ud for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 15:38:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C25CE3A0F7F for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 15:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8F69389CD; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 18:17:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id e2f0EWJd2lQ3; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 18:17:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A9C2389B3; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 18:17:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F241797; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 18:38:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com>, eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <cea7bf50-7324-7c77-8085-ad5504f2dff9@nthpermutation.com>
References: <20200814192145.iiuoma7a3frf7mm7@crankycanuck.ca> <006801d672e1$3a7989a0$af6c9ce0$@olddog.co.uk> <20200909180148.lr6ra2kgpsp3b4js@crankycanuck.ca> <9cebc2cb-656e-23ba-3e0f-996ed97de825@nthpermutation.com> <20200909212338.3opg6a55p5zjpfih@crankycanuck.ca> <cea7bf50-7324-7c77-8085-ad5504f2dff9@nthpermutation.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 18:38:37 -0400
Message-ID: <7791.1599691117@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/rhm0auAkDY9xkTkRcbTBX3zijFg>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Suggestions for nomcom chair selection?
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 22:38:45 -0000

Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com> wrote:
    >> On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 04:28:49PM -0400, Michael StJohns wrote:
    >>>
    >>> Let's let the Nomcom select the next Nomcom chair, with the approval
    >>> of the IAB and IESG.
    >>
    >> One complaint I have heard repeatedly is that the nomcom is already
    >> overloaded.  Beating the bushes for a good candidate and deciding on
    >> one this way strikes me as another pretty big burden. I am certainly
    >> willing to try it, however, if people want: I would agree to appoint
    >> whomever was selected that way, so that we didn't actually need to
    >> make a process change to try it out.  Of course, we'd have to get a
    >> nomcom to agree to add this to their plate!
    >>
    >> Best regards,
    >>
    >> A

    > One of the things here is that the selection period for the chair is
    > distinct from the normal work period for the Nomcom.  Say they start in
    > March and finish in July for the selection of the next chair?  Or even
    > a much shorter period than that  - May to June - given that there's
    > only one slot being filled.

Let me suggest that the Nomcom N (for years N/N+1), does not select
for Nomcom N+1, but for Nomcom N+2.

Nomcom N could work on this from January to March in year N+1.
They have to stick around waiting for the IAB to confirm IESG members, and
answer queries, and other stuff anyway.

Having selecting the chair for Nomcom N+2, that person could be appointed in
October of year N+1, and if Nomcom N+1 is happy, they could join as
Chair-Elect, learning the ropes by watching much easier.
This is what Allison had proposed, and I tried push convince people it was a
good idea, but did not get far.

This has a initialization challenge where in the first year we need to find
a chair for year 0 (in March), and for year 1 (by October), but aside from
that, it's not any more arduous, I think.

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide