Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Review of draft-carpenter-eligibility-expand-06

[Brian E Carpenter <[e-mail]>]

Bron is shepherding this draft, and I'd like to know if he
sees any changes that we should make urgently in the next day or so.
Otherwise it won't be updated before the I-D cutoff.

There are numerous changes needed following reviews by Lars, Victor
and Barry, but those are really all non-contentious clarifications
of intent. There is a remaining sense of doubt, I think, about
path 3 (authorship) but I didn't see a concrete proposal to change
it.

Regards
   Brian

On 30-Oct-20 13:25, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
> FWIW, I very much agree with Brian. See below for why...
> 
> On 30/10/2020 00:19, Michael Richardson wrote:
>> So, if we can't collect the things possible into this document, do they go
>> into another document?  And if so, does it get published, or just talked
>> about loudly?
> 
> This document will undergo an IETF last call. I predict that
> most people won't care and will say nothing. But many will
> care a lot and say a lot about all of the text it contains.
> 
> Given we do need to solve this problem in the short term, any
> and all extraneous text is IMO a risk not worth taking. It
> is entirely reasonable that many of us reasonable people
> disagree here and there about the margins between extraneous
> and not of course, but personally I reckon collecting any
> such additional information in a different draft is a way
> better plan. I guess where that ends up will depend on a
> bunch of things including the actual data found.
> 
> Cheers,
> S.
> 
> 
>