IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Eligibility-discuss] some numbers

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 22 April 2020 02:35 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC3E3A0B51 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 19:35:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d61a7bfilz77 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 19:35:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 265FD3A0B50 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 19:35:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F0753897D; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 22:33:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 533B0201; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 22:35:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "eligibility-discuss@ietf.org" <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <1f887326-339d-078f-e718-71ca090f762c@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <1f887326-339d-078f-e718-71ca090f762c@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 25.1.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 22:35:18 -0400
Message-ID: <29424.1587522918@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/su_XMb6mFSD_hRuvUiPZId3EVVA>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] some numbers
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 02:35:25 -0000

Thank you for doing this work.
I think that Ted's question is definitely an interesting one to answer.

I agree that persuing the draft is a good plan.

{My only quibble with the results is that sitting IESG members are not
eligible, nor will WG chairs that want to be selected want to serve}

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email