IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Eligibility-discuss] enfranchising mostly-remote participants

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Mon, 28 October 2019 15:47 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FEC81208FF for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 08:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1_SWeJc0Buin for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 08:47:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CF901208F7 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 08:47:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122332.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id x9SFkXZT016109; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 15:47:03 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=INgX50KqEKQE3t1qE7jxcth3RdnlPoJu80AWpBYJklU=; b=H5hVjjx6a13cpVbWysa2tU2ioaMMSNYB/NFYeP3vupQZcf+zCyzdW5mNDjgvfDIScHSO sMhNqzICIJTBIOU/vJq3sDZnbTwxcLjjlhX1cyNfZ9/c+xxfQVMaNgX2t3JUGqe3B8KH 2IO3dVQ10F3niRrhKv6PICAi5qJup9DXJqt0XC0yXJOZyqNYtdhpKcXN6ZLsBmAO2B0H jd4Dj9fx8FHL+6yzAGNGwFLceOHCHKa+SRzWHtKAAQCg3QqUClWtTlZUVpwoJr/ztkV1 /ucxsHhItL4D+NoX1qs3icH4XFhK6MJQFp52waCezO+lOAB+MqDSMf9EBzk7SENOiLUm vw==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint7 (prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com [96.6.114.121] (may be forged)) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2vve6hsyx6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 28 Oct 2019 15:47:03 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x9SFHNjf022125; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 11:47:02 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.30]) by prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2vvhg0ws7r-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 28 Oct 2019 11:47:01 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 11:47:00 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.005; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 11:47:00 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
CC: "eligibility-discuss@ietf.org" <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Eligibility-discuss] enfranchising mostly-remote participants
Thread-Index: AQHVi0J/luaCDonpGESOS5nP8T2bOqdremmAgAT2hYD//8ZsAA==
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 15:47:00 +0000
Message-ID: <A5F075E4-D74E-4AF0-A8D8-BDF37A8EE8E2@akamai.com>
References: <19743.1572014559@localhost> <A7577125-8E9F-46E9-8918-F1197B521208@akamai.com> <30298.1572275585@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <30298.1572275585@localhost>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1e.0.191013
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.33.37]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <8993D91D4A70674391F3B1E985E09042@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-10-28_06:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=414 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1910280156
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,1.0.8 definitions=2019-10-28_06:2019-10-28,2019-10-28 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=405 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1908290000 definitions=main-1910280159
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/yF44tpEh95ATkx83Jffo3eKawL4>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] enfranchising mostly-remote participants
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 15:47:06 -0000

>    Do you mean, how often do IESG seats need to be filled during a nomcom-term,
    or do you mean, how often do NOMCOM members need to be replaced?
  
I meant the latter.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email