Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Suggestions for nomcom chair selection?
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 10 September 2020 15:20 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D00A3A09A8 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 08:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NGdK6TQZLOvt for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 08:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46F773A099F for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 08:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98251389EB; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:58:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id BaHfVOVvSQiN; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:58:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E057389A5; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:58:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83516212; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:19:50 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>, "'eligibility-discuss@ietf.org'" <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <f43b1e6e57864ea1bc6bebf5f5b8f92a@att.com>
References: <20200814192145.iiuoma7a3frf7mm7@crankycanuck.ca> <006801d672e1$3a7989a0$af6c9ce0$@olddog.co.uk> <20200909180148.lr6ra2kgpsp3b4js@crankycanuck.ca> <9cebc2cb-656e-23ba-3e0f-996ed97de825@nthpermutation.com> <16328.1599685662@localhost> <f43b1e6e57864ea1bc6bebf5f5b8f92a@att.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:19:50 -0400
Message-ID: <5341.1599751190@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/znXbjzC6-mlyamWSOaubroNo_YI>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Suggestions for nomcom chair selection?
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:20:04 -0000
STARK, BARBARA H <bs7652@att.com> wrote: >> > As I was re-reading this thread, I came up with a fairly strange >> idea. >> >> > Let's let the Nomcom select the next Nomcom chair, with the approval >> of the > IAB and IESG. >> >> > Minimum ( non-waivable) qualifications: Must have served on the >> Nomcom > within the last 6 years (not including the current one). Must >> not have served > as chair within the last 10. Must have at least 2 up >> votes (recommendations) > from people (voting members?) who were on >> their same Nomcom. Must not be > working for the same company as any >> of the previous 5 chairs were when they > served as chairs. (Each of >> those numbers is arbitrary - can be twiddled for > balance - here just >> as a suggested starting point) >> >> I think that this might be overconstrained, but I certainly like the >> idea. > Note that the current NomCom chair has no prior NomCom experience. I > suspect this was not for lack of asking prior NomCom participants. I > suggest being careful adding constraints to a position that many people > do not want. > Or adding length of term / time commitment (e.g., 3 years > as chair-elect, chair, and then past chair advisor, instead of the > current 2). a) I think that the past-chair effort really ends around December. I personally found the past-chair effort rather easy. b) More and earlier training of the current chair probably makes the job lighter late on. But, I can respect that this seems scary looking at it. So I claim that introducing the chair-elect earlier might not really be that much more of a time commitment, the commitment is just shifted earlier. The past-chair/chair relationship is important, so establishing it earlier seems to be useful to me. I was fortunate in that I was a voting member of the previous nomcom. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
- [Eligibility-discuss] Suggestions for nomcom chai… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Suggestions for nomcom … Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Suggestions for nomcom … Michael Richardson
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Suggestions for nomcom … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Suggestions for nomcom … Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Suggestions for nomcom … Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Suggestions for nomcom … 'Andrew Sullivan'
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Suggestions for nomcom … Michael Richardson
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Suggestions for nomcom … Michael StJohns
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Suggestions for nomcom … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Suggestions for nomcom … Michael Richardson
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Suggestions for nomcom … Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Suggestions for nomcom … Michael StJohns
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Suggestions for nomcom … Michael Richardson
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Suggestions for nomcom … STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Suggestions for nomcom … Michael Richardson
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Suggestions for nomcom … Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Suggestions for nomcom … Victor Kuarsingh