Re: [Emailcore] Navigating 5321bis (and predecessors)

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Sun, 10 January 2021 03:21 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3A83A0AFB for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 19:21:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.452
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.452 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=iecc.com header.b=HSnCgm8A; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=taugh.com header.b=Zi605HGc
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lYUGRzu0RAOG for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 19:21:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 182AA3A0AFA for <emailcore@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 19:21:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 33093 invoked by uid 100); 10 Jan 2021 03:21:36 -0000
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 03:21:35 -0000
Message-ID: <rtdrrv$u6o$1@gal.iecc.com>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: emailcore@ietf.org
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:cleverness; s=813e.5ffa72bf.k2101; i=news@user.iecc.com; bh=Ykpqvnskv7kAP6IWpfmI6JxlQsVkxLTtcq2kjYGHyTA=; b=HSnCgm8Auy/j/1En5+6P2JNR+6y829TZBGfpRtIzxzhtNFyGYwu+m6l21ijl2hVqqCENcsHZI/HEWcH+vaD5yTklhi5tymNjzlwgGuoAGT2v3w72W/4Pr3rgx+QxWK5r5G8GVMVo4RwrVQTZRnkWcbnFyaEy7MTrV2yROY3/nIE37e2jrnXZSmnYBHdfsvTeEHNEeYZDEKxLl0KR4fKjp0Y9Y2RbjlL+i9h0dz7Ok8f/tJfOjX0AkbAqskIPLpBNkpmZVPCSbTy/jzC0LQJLL3Dm/yVezuQ0VzkTcVE4i8B1c0CrQDoN8+yPwGdzaYNzSxhSR0dBEzyFgfXEfTQNUA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:cleverness; s=813e.5ffa72bf.k2101; olt=news@user.iecc.com; bh=Ykpqvnskv7kAP6IWpfmI6JxlQsVkxLTtcq2kjYGHyTA=; b=Zi605HGcZZsSolTMNSmGM3Z0PvAAHSLwUYdCb3k4BOh4dUQANMJNhWqPK3d7bc5rs9k0RpOdKi0O1sqkOe8wkowTFeU9necZwaInOv5d6nCraErMdIcMiAegTGjOPQ9zkhcOsG3bY89MRuWOSNQtIqV9uV5SttWn0gU1ATxk/KNidTi6bt5B8X+P8yHxR55u51OP8Xwu4uS4V+Gl6ZVOUNv6wQRzQUSYmv/kV9Lyz/11FD7OYtq/mydW9XUIJWiMWhW6nxKH6FyoAO45GugQS4OElB0oGMIuzjCtiv8Yxxr5veYh8YsCJoY8BhVqPcR1mhQ1TO+afXOBp7BNQ5KR5A==
Organization: Taughannock Networks
References: <8034D30CAC474E52B15C1AC4@PSB> <5f8f7894-b736-1f15-2dd4-865f68d6702d@tana.it> <306A848BA9E6BE7CC38465E3@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <8034D30CAC474E52B15C1AC4@PSB> <5f8f7894-b736-1f15-2dd4-865f68d6702d@tana.it> <306A848BA9E6BE7CC38465E3@PSB>
Cleverness: some
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: johnl@iecc.com (John Levine)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emailcore/3_vvaQyMIGf83QenaYuqFCe_HlU>
Subject: Re: [Emailcore] Navigating 5321bis (and predecessors)
X-BeenThere: emailcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: EMAILCORE proposed working group list <emailcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emailcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:emailcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 03:21:38 -0000

In article <306A848BA9E6BE7CC38465E3@PSB>,
John C Klensin  <john@jck.com> wrote:
>> I think an index is useless nowadays, since page numbers are
>> not a univocal reference anymore (they only appear in PDFs and
>> are presumably going to depend on paper formats.)

Indices don't have to point to oage numbers.  They can refer to
section numbers or unsing this new-fangled web thing, they can
link directly to the relevant sections.

R's,
John
-- 
Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly