IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Emailcore] Ticket #15: G.7.9. Discussion of 'blind' copies and RCPT

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Tue, 19 January 2021 16:14 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5016E3A15EA for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 08:14:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.361
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.361 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.262, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isode.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jIOXd5j6mcyG for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 08:14:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from statler.isode.com (Statler.isode.com [62.232.206.189]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B904D3A15E7 for <emailcore@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 08:14:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1611072847; d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com; bh=/mB1/81wIvpFLPlzzphMboBJ1yTg+vaR4XpcBXEXAmk=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=E2Mndi5Pa+fqJkHzHV3S57GruRxDS2zf1UgOT29yyiTndmysQQNjTWRNbWKlyaXI+7T7VP 2WL2lAh3LQtsvU1FC5xjuOICdfSJcYjDpxZus2p4FAVecHGv1ppoTO4Pi2X/07HPDe4hzI 69htLtl+k6C+mC9kQB4u2oPAp48fAck=;
Received: from [172.27.250.167] (connect.isode.net [172.20.0.72]) by statler.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <YAcFTgBqmniE@statler.isode.com>; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:14:06 +0000
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
To: emailcore@ietf.org
References: <e40a609b-6df6-0e35-eedd-72d2c98fb02b@isode.com>
Message-ID: <5739eec7-ce97-fb3e-5f43-ca282c129238@isode.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:14:05 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0
In-Reply-To: <e40a609b-6df6-0e35-eedd-72d2c98fb02b@isode.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emailcore/7e3NogTteaseNz2I69Z0cIJwPCU>
Subject: Re: [Emailcore] Ticket #15: G.7.9. Discussion of 'blind' copies and RCPT
X-BeenThere: emailcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: EMAILCORE proposed working group list <emailcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emailcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:emailcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:14:09 -0000

Hi again,

Also, John Klensin asked: May also need to discuss whether that 
terminology is politically incorrect and suggest a replacement.

My reply as a participant:

  I think CC and BCC are well established terms, so changing it now is 
going to cause more harm then good. Besides I don't have any better 
proposal.

Best Regards,

Alexey

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email