Re: [Emailcore] Ticket #14: G.7.8. Review different size limits

John C Klensin <john@jck.com> Sun, 18 July 2021 04:49 UTC

Return-Path: <john@jck.com>
X-Original-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D7E3A0B67 for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 21:49:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5tYWz64tHPh1 for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 21:49:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (ns.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E9143A0B65 for <emailcore@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 21:49:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.252.137.10] (helo=PSB) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john@jck.com>) id 1m4yjn-000D67-Ea for emailcore@ietf.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 00:49:11 -0400
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 00:49:06 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john@jck.com>
To: emailcore@ietf.org
Message-ID: <27DFEEF9F70700A8298F6DFA@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <YPOrnstfucMXuHi6@straasha.imrryr.org>
References: <20210717161657.XGPW_%steffen@sdaoden.eu> <20210717220940.E225824AAB35@ary.qy> <YPOKS9b5kmo8P+Ug@straasha.imrryr.org> <01S1IPUAUTZ6005PTU@mauve.mrochek.com> <F51C0E5C4AC6703FAB7C7D88@PSB> <YPOrnstfucMXuHi6@straasha.imrryr.org>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.10
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emailcore/WmEg2qtVVlc3aQqoz73f0Zhr2iY>
Subject: Re: [Emailcore] Ticket #14: G.7.8. Review different size limits
X-BeenThere: emailcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: EMAILCORE proposed working group list <emailcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emailcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:emailcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 04:49:17 -0000


--On Sunday, July 18, 2021 00:18 -0400 Viktor Dukhovni
<ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 10:42:41PM -0400, John C Klensin wrote:
> 
>> > Our MTA defaults to this as well. But it's trivial to switch
>> > off, and I have no way of knowing how many sites do so.
>> 
>> Completely out of curiosity, as the amount of traffic that
>> does not use Latin script increases (IMO, quoted-printable is
>> far less useful when most of the characters are outside the
>> ASCII repertoire), do either of you do the fairly minimal
>> analysis needed to decide when Base64 would be more compact
>> and no less useful?
> 
> No, because message sizes are rarely dominated by the text
> parts.  The large attachments that dominate message sizes are
> typically already Base64 encoded.  Just using quoted-printable
> is not a problem for the 8bit text, even when not optimal.

Makes sense, especially if there are non-text body parts.  And
John Levine's observation that 8BITMIME appears to be
universally supported at this stage makes the whole issue moot
although, perhaps just out of habit, I continue to worry about
people who have much worse Internet connections than those
participating in this discussion..

tnanks,
   john