Re: [Emailcore] Ticket #14: G.7.8. Review different size limits

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Sun, 18 July 2021 04:18 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590B03A0919 for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 21:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QlyBy1qK5B-z for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 21:18:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from straasha.imrryr.org (straasha.imrryr.org [100.2.39.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8D213A0914 for <emailcore@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 21:18:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by straasha.imrryr.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 024BEDC2D5; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 00:18:39 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 00:18:38 -0400
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
To: emailcore@ietf.org
Message-ID: <YPOrnstfucMXuHi6@straasha.imrryr.org>
Reply-To: emailcore@ietf.org
References: <20210717161657.XGPW_%steffen@sdaoden.eu> <20210717220940.E225824AAB35@ary.qy> <YPOKS9b5kmo8P+Ug@straasha.imrryr.org> <01S1IPUAUTZ6005PTU@mauve.mrochek.com> <F51C0E5C4AC6703FAB7C7D88@PSB>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <F51C0E5C4AC6703FAB7C7D88@PSB>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emailcore/bgu1awkoyiYr2vDGsvuiIWD8cfU>
Subject: Re: [Emailcore] Ticket #14: G.7.8. Review different size limits
X-BeenThere: emailcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: EMAILCORE proposed working group list <emailcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emailcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:emailcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 04:18:47 -0000

On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 10:42:41PM -0400, John C Klensin wrote:

> > Our MTA defaults to this as well. But it's trivial to switch
> > off, and I have no way of knowing how many sites do so.
> 
> Completely out of curiosity, as the amount of traffic that does
> not use Latin script increases (IMO, quoted-printable is far
> less useful when most of the characters are outside the ASCII
> repertoire), do either of you do the fairly minimal analysis
> needed to decide when Base64 would be more compact and no less
> useful?

No, because message sizes are rarely dominated by the text parts.  The
large attachments that dominate message sizes are typically already
Base64 encoded.  Just using quoted-printable is not a problem for the
8bit text, even when not optimal.

-- 
    Viktor.