Re: [Emailcore] Navigating 5321bis (and predecessors)

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Thu, 07 January 2021 09:25 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CDAB3A0D04 for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 01:25:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.262, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1152-bit key) header.d=tana.it
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YiVIEU8jNWqr for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 01:25:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B15A3A0CED for <emailcore@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 01:25:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=delta; t=1610011534; bh=rGmEt5StlewSV/Qc50hDhR01MoM6iGqv0XjUJpAe0pQ=; l=740; h=To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=AzW8s0Jllu9IEo2Op/F3dyJ0RHGvvvGFIXiKf7/fUTHx9FNQUtyIqU1sS9mrS0yMv T89WLezUomKp7qYmaMVhqergIEHTZZbW4v4qFEM/5ai0FNpJUfEJcBD09CWAvwrn3s bX4mkeDJg/mkOzdpbDoZF6czXjqgaRaNWKcgBRVYXRC+8MipMSuHFv+BrDR+m
Authentication-Results: tana.it; auth=pass (details omitted)
Original-From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Received: from [172.25.197.111] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.111]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k, TLS: TLS1.3, 128bits, ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA id 00000000005DC07E.000000005FF6D38E.000010AA; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 10:25:34 +0100
To: emailcore@ietf.org
References: <8034D30CAC474E52B15C1AC4@PSB>
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Message-ID: <5f8f7894-b736-1f15-2dd4-865f68d6702d@tana.it>
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 10:25:32 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8034D30CAC474E52B15C1AC4@PSB>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emailcore/kze7ZHaWMXk-4XcLCKd5jAhkJAQ>
Subject: Re: [Emailcore] Navigating 5321bis (and predecessors)
X-BeenThere: emailcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: EMAILCORE proposed working group list <emailcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emailcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:emailcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 09:25:38 -0000

On Fri 01/Jan/2021 21:18:28 +0100 John C Klensin wrote:
>
> Two questions I'd like WG participants to think about:
> 
> (1) How much reorganizing and rewriting do we want to do and what are our
> stopping rules?

Minimal reorganizing and rewriting, but not less.


> (2) Are there ways that we can mitigate the problems with finding things.
> [...]  Would that be worth doing in terms of finding information or is the
> table of contents sufficient?   Other ideas?

I think an index is useless nowadays, since page numbers are not a univocal 
reference anymore (they only appear in PDFs and are presumably going to depend 
on paper formats.)

Rather, I'd insert [See also <xref>] notes wherever appropriate.


Best
Ale
--