Re: [eman] DRAFT minutes for our meeting at IETF-89

Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> Fri, 25 April 2014 18:43 UTC

Return-Path: <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
X-Original-To: eman@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eman@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A2B21A06A9 for <eman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 11:43:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.174
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.174 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, J_CHICKENPOX_56=0.6, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RvZoAUZb4pq9 for <eman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 11:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lucidvision.com (lucidvision.com [72.71.250.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB0AA1A06BF for <eman@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 11:42:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.112] (static-72-71-250-38.cncdnh.fast04.myfairpoint.net [72.71.250.38]) by lucidvision.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5497277AFF5; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 14:42:51 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CEC56EA1-D352-4154-AF8F-34B049A2CA19"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
In-Reply-To: <5357DE5E.4070302@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 14:42:50 -0400
Message-Id: <96117AE3-DBD7-4ED1-971F-0DB00DEF6735@lucidvision.com>
References: <531758DF.4070708@auckland.ac.nz> <CF409FC8.23F16%moulchan@cisco.com> <532C7037.7010002@auckland.ac.nz> <5357DE5E.4070302@cisco.com>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eman/2TTpvp9WtOmpfBfOtKQd_CCKPqU
Cc: "eman@ietf.org" <eman@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [eman] DRAFT minutes for our meeting at IETF-89
X-BeenThere: eman@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the Energy Management Working Group <eman.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eman>, <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/eman/>
List-Post: <mailto:eman@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman>, <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 18:43:20 -0000

I don't think we care. I'll make sure its correct at RFC Edit time.

On Apr 23, 2014:11:38 AM, at 11:38 AM, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:

> Hi Nevil, Mouli,
>> Hi Mouli:
>> 
>> I agree that this is sensible.  I think the best way to
>> make sure it happens will be for the Document Shepherd (probably
>> Tom) should include the 'please change title when published'
>> request in the Shepherd write-ip.
> Actually, the draft title is already changed.
> The draft name is wrong, but that one will disappear once the RFC is published. So do  we care?
> 
>                        Energy Object Context MIB
>                     draft-ietf-eman-energy-aware-mib-14
> 
> Regards, Benoit
>> 
>> Cheers, Nevil
>> 
>> 
>> On 03/08/2014 05:59 PM, Mouli Chandramouli (moulchan) wrote:
>>> Hi Nevil and Tom,
>>> 
>>> There is one point I would like to mention.
>>> 
>>> As of now,  the title of the draft  is   - draft-ietf-eman-energy-aware-mib-14
>>> 
>>> But the actual name of the MIB module is :  (this   name was feedback from the WG).
>>> 
>>>         ENERGY-OBJECT-CONTEXT-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
>>> 
>>>         energyObjectContextMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
>>> 
>>> 
>>> We did not change the name of the draft, since ID tracker would revert to draft.00
>>> 
>>> We request that the name of the draft would be consistent with the name of MIB module, before it becomes an RFC.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> Mouli
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> Mouli
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi all:
>>> 
>>> Here is the first draft of the meeting minutes.  Corrections and/or comments
>>> to the EMAN list please.
>>> 
>>> Cheers, Nevil
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 1-para summary for EMAN meeting at IETF-89
>>> 
>>> The EMAN Framework draft is now with IESG, work progresses on our
>>> three MIB drafts.   We expect to submit all three before IETF-90.
>>> That leaves the EMAN Applicability Statement; we discussed what's
>>> needed to complete that.  Our target is to get this to WGLC soon
>>> after IETF-91.  Two other drafts were presented, mailing list
>>> discussion is encouraged.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Minutes of the EMAN meeting at IETF 89 in London, version 00
>>> 
>>> About 25 people attended the meeting + several on jabber
>>> 
>>> Scribes: Nevil Brownlee, John Parello
>>> Jabber Scribe: Rolf Winter
>>> 
>>> WG Status
>>> ---------
>>> - Rolf Winter commented that in Framework-15, "must" in "An Energy
>>>    Object must be a member of a single Energy Management Domain"
>>>    ought to be "MUST."
>>> - Framework-16 (with that change) is on IESG telechat agenda for 20 Mar 14
>>> - All three MIB drafts completed WGLC by 24 Jan 14, to discussed in meeting
>>> - Applicability has been parked, will now be worked on
>>> 
>>> Energy-aware- MIB -15
>>> -------------------------
>>> Presented by John Parello
>>> - Reviewed changes, reviewed issues with r/w MIB objects.
>>> - Chair guidance was "the MIB was developed using r/w, changing to r/o
>>>    would require significant work, keep them as r/w."  The meeting had clear
>>>    consensus for r/w, our AD agreed with that; clear WG consensus is to
>>>    use r/w objects for all three MIBs
>>> - This version is ready to submit
>>> 
>>> Power and Energy Monitoring MIB -09
>>> -----------------------------------
>>> Presented by John Parello
>>> - IANA section was edited, but introduced errors in not making this
>>>    an IANA-controlled MIB. This will be be resolved with a new version
>>> - New revision needed
>>> 
>>> Battery MIB -11
>>> ------------------------
>>> Presented by Rolf Winter
>>> - Many open issues closed at -10
>>> - John commented that batteryIdentifier should be "a general UUID, with
>>>    the manufacturer model,serial and number being used to create the UUID."
>>> - Notification rate limiting is not in place for all monitoring values,
>>>    this is hard to fix for batteryTemperatureNotification
>>> - New revision needed, with fixes to above issues
>>> 
>>> Applicability Statement -04
>>> ---------------------------
>>> Presented by Nevil Brownlee
>>> - Single slide from Mouli Chandramouli listed work still needed
>>> - Most of the text is already available, since it was culled from other
>>>    drafts, or is in list discussions
>>> - Rolf suggested including a section on Energy Management Domains,
>>>    explaining why the Framework uses "MUST be a member of a single Energy
>>>    Management Domain;" he will provide text
>>> - New revision needed, aim for WGLC soon after IETF-90
>>> 
>>> Other Presentations
>>> -------------------
>>> 
>>> Network Proxy Protocol -02
>>> --------------------------
>>> Presented by Sangjin Jeong
>>> - Modified for IPv4, added DHCP operation
>>> - The chairs were not able to show two video clips for this presentation,
>>>    URLs for them are given in this meeting's agenda
>>> - Rolf commented that Bonjour has a similar sleeping proxy
>>> - Continue to discuss on EMAN list
>>> 
>>> Green Usage MIB -03
>>> -------------------
>>> Presented by Takuo Suganuma
>>> - Reviewed progress, added power estimation
>>> - Next will ink to EMAN MIB and Framework
>>> - Further discussion on EMAN list is welcome
>>> 
>>> Next steps for EMAN
>>> -------------------
>>> - Update milestones, goal is to submit the MIBs before IETF-90,
>>>    and the Applicability Statement soon after that.  That will complete
>>>    the EMAN charter
>>> - WG will not close until all our drafts are through IESG
>>> - New work will not be added to our charter unless there is clear
>>>    consensus for doing that.  OpsArea WG would be a good place for
>>>    such work
>>> 
>>> The meeting finished at 1620.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Nevil Brownlee (ISE), rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org<mailto:rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>   Nevil Brownlee                    Computer Science Department | ITS
>>>   Phone: +64 9 373 7599 x88941             The University of Auckland
>>>   FAX: +64 9 373 7453   Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> eman mailing list
>>> eman@ietf.org<mailto:eman@ietf.org>
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> eman mailing list
> eman@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman
>