Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF?

[Alexandre Petrescu <[e-mail]>]

Le 02/06/2016 à 10:18, Rolf Winter a écrit :
> Is there anything that the EMAN work is not addressing or that
> requires new protocol work?

For my clarification - is the battery monitoring MIB RFC7577 using YANG?

Alex

>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Nadeau Thomas <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>>         Not that I know of in the form of an official working group. EMAN was shut down something like a year ago.
>>
>>         --Tom
>>
>>> On Jun 1, 2016:8:34 AM, at 8:34 AM, Alexandre Petrescu <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Is there any other effort focusing on energy consumption happening at IETF currently?
>>>
>>> I am interested in aspects related to energy consumption of IP networks used to deliver video streams.
>>>
>>> Yours,
>>>
>>> Alex Petrescu
>>>
>>> Le 09/06/2015 à 05:01, Mouli Chandramouli (moulchan) a écrit :
>>>> Thanks to all the WG chairs for shepherding the IETF drafts and taking
>>>> them to a conclusion.
>>>> I may not be able to travel to Prague.  So, enjoy.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Mouli
>>>>
>>>> From: Nadeau Thomas <[e-mail]
>>>> <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>>>> Date: Saturday, 6 June 2015 2:22 AM
>>>> To: "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>>>> Cc: eman mailing list <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>,
>>>> "[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>"
>>>> <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>>>> Subject: Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    Beers are on you! 8)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>    On Jun 5, 2015:4:46 PM, at 4:46 PM, Benoit Claise
>>>>>    <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>    Yes, thanks to the contributors, document editors, WG chairs,
>>>>>    previous ADs :-), basically the entire EMAN community.
>>>>>    Celebration in Prague? Fine with me.
>>>>>
>>>>>    Regards, Benoit
>>>>>>    Greetings,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Now that we've crossed the milstone of having
>>>>>>    draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement-11 move to the RFC editor queue,
>>>>>>    I think we can pause and reflect on the effort that has completed. It
>>>>>>    took a while to get here and the consensus that we built was hard won
>>>>>>    but I hope durable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    It's my intention to close down the working group, maintaining the
>>>>>>    mailing list for a time. The mailing list archive as with other IETF
>>>>>>    mailing lists will be preserved. in the immediate sense if there is work
>>>>>>    around the edges of this space we have the opsawg working group to
>>>>>>    support such activities.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Thank you again for your diligent efforts, especially the present and
>>>>>>    former chairs who shepherded this work to the point that it is at now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Regards
>>>>>>    Joel
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    _______________________________________________
>>>>>>    eman mailing list
>>>>>>    [e-mail]://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman
>>>>>
>>>>>    _______________________________________________
>>>>>    eman mailing list
>>>>>    [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>>>>>    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> eman mailing list
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> eman mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> eman mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman
>